You cool, man? This right here is salt. He was just explaining details to someone who clearly understood not one thing about the significance of the situation, nor did he seem to afterwards. What thin skin and self-importnace you have to be so offended over such a minuscule detail such as the perceived tone of his post.
Originally Posted by qaccy
I read it, and i doubt a 'clerical error' is all it was. It wouldn't be a legal incident if it was just an error. Too many plot holes in that statement.
Originally Posted by Zeo