wikileaks hacking history

• Osayidan wrote on 2010-12-16 12:14
  This article details the history day by day of the back and forth of attacks on websites and online services.
  
  http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/tis-the-season-of-ddos-wikileaks-editio/
• Roy Mustang wrote on 2010-12-16 12:57
  Wow, I read that entire thing. Very interesting. I look foward to watching the news to see what Anonymous does next. The fax idea seems kind of funny as well as the distribution plan...
  
  So many splinter groups lol.
• Ampersand wrote on 2010-12-16 13:08
  wikileaks needs to leak the list of its members.
• krpr wrote on 2010-12-16 13:20
  lol anon legion being epic again
• Cucurbita wrote on 2010-12-16 14:11

  Quote from Ampersand;249678:

  wikileaks needs to leak the list of its members.

  
  
  They all work without a name, under anonymous, and probably behind a proxy too.
  They can't even if they wanted to.
• TA wrote on 2010-12-16 14:14
  Hm, read the whole thing.
• Cucurbita wrote on 2010-12-16 14:39
  Unfortunately, truly a black eye at best.
  The best way to make this efficient is to just focus fire on one target and stop switching so much.
• gentrone wrote on 2010-12-16 15:05
  This is like a war. Information is indeed a powerful resource.
  
  

  [Image: http://pandalabs.pandasecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/operation_leakspin.jpg]
• Athde wrote on 2010-12-16 15:11

  Quote from Cucurbita;249713:

  UThey all work without a name, under anonymous, and probably behind a proxy too.
  They can't even if they wanted to.

  
  
  Reminds me of this:
  

  [Image: http://images.whatport80.com/images/c/c9/Good_Luck_I%27m_Behind_7_Proxies.jpg]
• Osayidan wrote on 2010-12-16 16:28

  Quote from Cucurbita;249707:

  They all work without a name, under anonymous, and probably behind a proxy too.
  They can't even if they wanted to.

  
  
  

  [Image: http://i51.tinypic.com/212690l.png]
• Chihaya wrote on 2010-12-16 17:06

  Quote from Osayidan;249754:

  [Image: http://i51.tinypic.com/212690l.png]

  
  
  Loled. I recently heard of this group, and our class was discussing whether or not what they're doing is good or bad.
  What do you all think? =)
• gentrone wrote on 2010-12-16 17:07
  Good of course.
• Osayidan wrote on 2010-12-16 17:08
  Good. They're seen as bad, and as individuals i'm sure lots of them are retards, but the cause is good.
• Cucurbita wrote on 2010-12-16 17:25

  Quote from Chihaya;249775:

  Loled. I recently heard of this group, and our class was discussing whether or not what they're doing is good or bad.
  What do you all think? =)

  
  
  see thething here is, anon isn't really a "group" like everyone thinks it is.
  Anyone can be an anon from anywhere. Because there is no form of identificaOtion, there are no leaders, no recognizable members, and their only meeting place are anonymous boards like 4chan.
  
  one person says "hey guys, this is happening, wanna do this in response?" and others just join in. I’ve even done a thing or two as an anon.
  
  In this sense the anonymous motto is about as accurate as it gets. "We are no one and everyone". And with that comes both positive and negative reputationas it could be a bunch of douche bags trolling someone, or a collection of outraged individuals who want to bring some cat abuser to justice.
  
  Because these people are safely hidden behind having no identity they bring out their true innerselves or even go too far sometimes. One thing is certain though, individually they are nothing special, but collectively they are a powerful resource.
• Osayidan wrote on 2010-12-16 19:32

  Quote from Cucurbita;249790:

  see thething here is, anon isn't really a "group" like everyone thinks it is.
  Anyone can be an anon from anywhere. Because there is no form of identificaOtion, there are no leaders, no recognizable members, and their only meeting place are anonymous boards like 4chan.
  
  one person says "hey guys, this is happening, wanna do this in response?" and others just join in. I’ve even done a thing or two as an anon.
  
  In this sense the anonymous motto is about as accurate as it gets. "We are no one and everyone". And with that comes both positive and negative reputationas it could be a bunch of douche bags trolling someone, or a collection of outraged individuals who want to bring some cat abuser to justice.
  
  Because these people are safely hidden behind having no identity they bring out their true innerselves or even go too far sometimes. One thing is certain though, individually they are nothing special, but collectively they are a powerful resource.

  
  
  They don't ID themselves but online their IPs do all the work.
  Out of all those folks who used the voluntary DDoS application, probably only a handful used it behind a proxy, and even fewer behind a proxy that actually does its job, and even fewer than that behind a proxy that does it's job properly by using such screwed up routes you'll never trace it back.
  
  Most of them who claimed they used a proxy probably just wrote the proxy info on their internet options but forgot that it has no effect except on your browsers and certain apps.
  
  I'd be participating too if it wasn't for that, using a proxy for DDoS is pointless since you'll pretty much be DDoSing the proxy in the process.