This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
Gotejjeken wrote on 2011-02-02 22:07
Invalid how? You pay more money for a slight chance at getting an item (and have to be playing every day to take advantage of that stat), and I pay less money simply for looks, which never expire. I personally would take the permanent option, as that LUK stat means very little when you can simply play the market for all your money.
-
Skye wrote on 2011-02-02 22:33
It's all a matter of opinion, you guys. Some people like good-looking undies and will spend/waste money on it, some don't see the point.
I myself am guilty of buying things because they look good. Hence, my Christmas undies and my future Valentine undies.
It's all a matter of how you want to spend, or not spend, your own money (or the free stuff from surveys).
-
EmmaR wrote on 2011-02-02 22:36
Quote from Mama;316312:
:I
if you REALLY wanted, just make the bows and stocking the same colour
minimal
(bows? on a girl? blasphemy.)
[SIZE="6"][COLOR="White"]/not
[/SIZE]
Well it'd get boring pretty fast to see someone always with black inner, for example... I saw people post screenshots of the Christmas one.
(Mine is black and purple :D two of my fav colours)
It's like Fashionogi and everyone always having to have white or black, flashy or non, or some combination thereof.
Quote from PBnJamz;315626:
Yea, the bows completely ruins it
But I'm fiona and her's is hot<3
My Fiona is not a girly-girl, she doesn't need bows lol. She eats cute things for breakfast :XD:[/COLOR]
-
Gotejjeken wrote on 2011-02-02 22:42
Mine doesn't :\. Well, only when I need to =D.
-
CodeS wrote on 2011-02-02 22:52
Quote from Cucurbita;317103:
If you don't get stats from the permanent underarmor, the entire argument is invalid.(in my opinion)
i fixed it for you; to some people stats matter the most, others valued the looks.
I, myself, don't care about the stats that much. So if you dont want to buy it, don't buy it.
Debating whether it's worth the money or not is pretty much useless, b/c of two very different standards.
P.S: Could u change ur Signature picture? it FREAKED me out EVERY SINGLE TIME i looked @ it. =.="
-
Sora wrote on 2011-02-02 23:24
/requests to close thread.
I said what I had to say, its going off topic into arguments now.
-
Mama wrote on 2011-02-03 18:01
Quote from CodeS;317347:
i fixed it for you; to some people stats matter the most, others valued the looks.
I, myself, don't care about the stats that much. So if you dont want to buy it, don't buy it.
Debating whether it's worth the money or not is pretty much useless, b/c of two very different standards.
P.S: Could u change ur Signature picture? it FREAKED me out EVERY SINGLE TIME i looked @ it. =.="
Yes, you're right. that's also why evies with lagho exist, and why people wear nightmare set, even when it's nowhere near as beneficial to gameplay. Looks matter a lot to people :I
also, just right click-> block image if you dont want to see it (I do it with almost everyone's signature to save space)
-
whocares8128 wrote on 2011-02-03 20:54
Quote from Sora;315085:
Wasted 20$ on christmas for nothing, thanks alot nexon.
It's not exactly a "waste." You still have your inner (and always will). That you no longer want to use it (because a newer/better inner has come out for permanent purchase) is ... well ... understandable, but you
did have the security of knowing you will always have an inner to be able to wear (that isn't completely horrible), and the Christmas inner
was the only permanent inner for ~1.5 months.
Of course, there are those like me that
thought Nexon might do something like this (though it was a gamble where losing could mean forfeiting any chance of ever having a permanent inner).
-
Ailyene wrote on 2011-02-04 10:33
I'm kinda glad I play Fiona simply so I won't be tempted to buy that inner armor, haha. I...I prefer that other sexy one. :( Even if it IS pretty expensive.
-
Mystickskye wrote on 2011-02-05 01:19
As something of a note, Nexon NA is seemingly introducing more statless permanent inner armour due to the demand for it. So evidently, a sufficient number of players care for appearance.
-
CodeS wrote on 2011-02-05 04:51
Quote from Mama;318658:
also, just right click-> block image if you dont want to see it (I do it with almost everyone's signature to save space)
OMG thank you very much~~~ never thought of that xD
Back to the topic, YES i am so mad @ Nexon, i think the Valentine looks so much better then the X-mas one~~~
I think this is it for me; I have enough stockings and need some legs =.="
-
xuantian wrote on 2011-02-06 18:19
Nexon always over charges sigh... $20 can buy tons of games in apple app store.
anyways, I always wait for better, so i ignored the christmas ones (strips looks ugly and jungle-blahell)
I liked the valentine lann so buying that but evie so far i want a no stocking one! Come on! Fiona never expose her legs and yet she always get the no-stocking vesion!!!
And yes, curse Nexon inside.