Quote from Mythical Detective Loki;405053:
What.
MSE is worse.
No.
Quote from Mythical Detective Loki;405082:
[Image: http://static.avast.com/i/loc/graph-avcomparatives.jpg]
Just leaving that here.
Well, since you took AV-Comparatives' chart, why not look at their actual tests and draw up some conclusions?
*Sure, going by read speed, Avast appears to be vastly superior to MSE in scan time. However, MSE has less impact on your PC's performance than Avast. MSE lets you adjust how much CPU % the scanner is allowed to use, default being 50%. That chart also doesn't represent a real-world use case, since both AVs skip files that were scanned already. Avast has an advantage on the first scan only.
*MSE's heuristics-based malware detection rate is higher than Avast's, while maintaining a much lower false positive rate.
*MSE's signature-based malware detection rate is lower than Avast's, but Avast still has more false positives, so it's not that great there.
*MSE's malware removal capabilities are superior to those of Avast.
------
It also installs less crap, which is a plus.
Nothing is more aggravating than a false positive, because you didn't do anything wrong as a user when that happens, but the junk antivirus makes you think that you have.
Therefore,
MSE > Avast