This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
Noxctis wrote on 2011-09-24 18:29
If you're asian, you'll consider B's to be average, C's to be big, and D's to be bigger. That's for the majority in my experience. Not always the case. I started dating white girls and wow, they have really nice body and C's are like the average for white girls I dated, I dated a few Ds once and their body was really nice. Too big really depends on the girl. I'm more of a butt person anyways. TMI for some of you folks.
-
M wrote on 2011-09-24 18:40
[Image: http://puu.sh/61xm]
I have no objections to this.
-
Xemnas wrote on 2011-09-24 18:46
Quote from Maia;598079:
[Image: http://puu.sh/61xm]
I have no objections to this.
I posted that earlier as well.
edit: as for pay, you already bought them, why pay them? They can't leave you.
(yes they'd be the same as slaves but they're not real)
-
M wrote on 2011-09-24 18:47
Quote from Xemnas;598086:
I posted that earlier as well.
And I still have no objections to it
-
Kaeporo wrote on 2011-09-24 19:00
What's with the ridiculously overpowered new content? From the partner system and metalwear upgrades to broken new enchants (ie: war), it's starting to feel like DevCat is never going to update some of the older crap in game...like the pet system. Seriously, the majority of pets suck.
You can make the new stuff awesome but don't let it overcentralize the game.
-
Yoorah wrote on 2011-09-24 19:08
Nothing about these is "overpowering." They're just a unique idea, and quite elaborately implemented. You want to introduce new things to "overcentralize" the game because a dull game like most MMORPGs are would get boring otherwise. They're just adding new things that people can focus on if they're interested. I wouldn't say that these partners "overcentralize" the game, however. Again, it's just a neat feature.
-
Kaeporo wrote on 2011-09-24 19:30
Quote from Yoorah;598127:
Nothing about these is "overpowering." They're just a unique idea, and quite elaborately implemented. You want to introduce new things to "overcentralize" the game because a dull game like most MMORPGs are would get boring otherwise. They're just adding new things that people can focus on if they're interested. I wouldn't say that these partners "overcentralize" the game, however. Again, it's just a neat feature.
My problem is that all of these things cost exuberant amounts of real money. While there's nothing wrong with making a decent profit, you can't obtain any of these things in-game. That's the wrong way to go about running a cash shop.
You'll suck without at least a hundred dollars worth of combo cards and metalwear upgrade kits come G15. Though I suppose you could make an argument that all end-game content can be tackled safely without those "luxuries".
-
TheKartheus wrote on 2011-09-24 19:34
I find it funny how people don't like big boobs because they feel they want to "look past more than just looks" or something to that effect.
Aren't you doing exactly what you are trying to condemn by saying that?
-
Xemnas wrote on 2011-09-24 19:44
Quote from TheKartheus;598173:
I find it funny how people don't like big boobs because they feel they want to "look past more than just looks" or something to that effect.
Aren't you doing exactly what you are trying to condemn by saying that?
Best post in the thread aside from OP so far.
-
Yoorah wrote on 2011-09-24 19:49
Quote from Kaeporo;598160:
My problem is that all of these things cost exuberant amounts of real money. While there's nothing wrong with making a decent profit, you can't obtain any of these things in-game. That's the wrong way to go about running a cash shop.
You'll suck without at least a hundred dollars worth of combo cards and metalwear upgrade kits come G15. Though I suppose you could make an argument that all end-game content can be tackled safely without those "luxuries".
Ah, yes. Cost is a different issue altogether, and I have to agree there. I thought you were ranting about this in the same way you were ranting about golems being "OP". :p
Metal toolkit upgrades are indeed a means for NX whores to get crazy overpowered equipment, but on the other hand, even the gold-bought upgrades can give you decent benefits, some of them extremely useful (such as skill training boosts). I don't think the average player should be upset by this. Only NX-less stat whores would be pissed, but even then, many of those people are heavily NX funded through NX buying with gold, so it's not much of an issue for them either.
I can't say I like this in principle, but such is the business model of a "f2p" game. :(
-
Cynic wrote on 2011-09-24 20:45
I don't want to look past the looks; it's a virtual character. I'm just not attracted to big breasts.
People who like big breasts usually care about nothing BUT looks.
-
TheKartheus wrote on 2011-09-24 21:00
Just another random thought I had.
How come it's considered bad to judge people based on how they look and not their personality? It seems that this is not something anyone ever bothers questioning; you're just supposed to know that personality is more important.
But what I want to know is, what makes us think that? Is it a moral thing for most people? But again, why would it be morally better to judge someone based on their personality? If you wanted to be truly moral, you wouldn't judge them at all in the first place.
Maybe we should look at this from a different angle: why do we find certain features attractive to people? I think it has something to do with evolution; girls are usually attracted to guys with strong muscles and big abs because when the human race was evolving, stronger meant stronger children, children more likely to survive the harsh times. But nowadays this has left us; we know longer need to be strong to survive (usually). Is that why we've decided to put more emphasis on personality? Perhaps better personality gives us a better chance of meeting someone who will like you and bearing children. But this obviously is not the case, since people still do place importance on attractiveness.
So I'm curious; what are your reasons for thinking personality is more important than looks? Or do you even believe that at all?
--------------------------------------
Note: Not that I don't believe it myself, but I just like to think about the philisophical reasoning behind things.
-
Azareel wrote on 2011-09-24 21:13
Quote from TheKartheus;598363:
[SPOILER="Spoiler"]Just another random thought I had.
How come it's considered bad to judge people based on how they look and not their personality? It seems that this is not something anyone ever bothers questioning; you're just supposed to know that personality is more important.
But what I want to know is, what makes us think that? Is it a moral thing for most people? But again, why would it be morally better to judge someone based on their personality? If you wanted to be truly moral, you wouldn't judge them at all in the first place.
Maybe we should look at this from a different angle: why do we find certain features attractive to people? I think it has something to do with evolution; girls are usually attracted to guys with strong muscles and big abs because when the human race was evolving, stronger meant stronger children, children more likely to survive the harsh times. But nowadays this has left us; we know longer need to be strong to survive (usually). Is that why we've decided to put more emphasis on personality? Perhaps better personality gives us a better chance of meeting someone who will like you and bearing children. But this obviously is not the case, since people still do place importance on attractiveness.
So I'm curious; what are your reasons for thinking personality is more important than looks? Or do you even believe that at all?
--------------------------------------
Note: Not that I don't believe it myself, but I just like to think about the philisophical reasoning behind things.[/SPOILER]
Or we could stick to the thread topic, and not turn this thread into a discussion over individual philosophy. :skip:
-
TheKartheus wrote on 2011-09-24 21:16
Quote from Azareel;598388:
Or we could stick to the thread topic, and not turn this thread into a discussion over individual philosophy. :skip:
I thought about that, but then I decided to post anyway since I already wrote it all out.
-
radionoise wrote on 2011-09-24 21:25
Quote from TheKartheus;598363:
Just another random thought I had.
How come it's considered bad to judge people based on how they look and not their personality? It seems that this is not something anyone ever bothers questioning; you're just supposed to know that personality is more important.
But what I want to know is, what makes us think that? Is it a moral thing for most people? But again, why would it be morally better to judge someone based on their personality? If you wanted to be truly moral, you wouldn't judge them at all in the first place.
Maybe we should look at this from a different angle: why do we find certain features attractive to people? I think it has something to do with evolution; girls are usually attracted to guys with strong muscles and big abs because when the human race was evolving, stronger meant stronger children, children more likely to survive the harsh times. But nowadays this has left us; we know longer need to be strong to survive (usually). Is that why we've decided to put more emphasis on personality? Perhaps better personality gives us a better chance of meeting someone who will like you and bearing children. But this obviously is not the case, since people still do place importance on attractiveness.
So I'm curious; what are your reasons for thinking personality is more important than looks? Or do you even believe that at all?
--------------------------------------
Note: Not that I don't believe it myself, but I just like to think about the philisophical reasoning behind things.
Too deep for a discussion about boobs.