What I understand (Simplified)
- Pansexual - Attracted to all genders.
- Bisexual - Attracted to both (which is all) sexes.
- There are two sexes, male or female. This is genetically determined.
- There is a wide spectrum of genders, which people choose to identify as. (Not genetically determined.)
What confuses me
To me, this seems like its one of those cases where a square is a rectangle, but a rectangle isn't a square. Pansexuality fits under bisexuality, because all genders are contained by both sexes. Bisexuality doesn't fit under pansexuality, however, because a person who is bisexual may not be attracted to all genders.
This being said, I'm not saying that pansexuals should call themselves bisexual. There is an obvious need for both terms, and I agree that they are two separate sexualities. Whenever I ask somebody, however, if the above logic is/isn't correct, they shut down the conversation and call me a bigot. I'm not wanting to force anything on anybody... I'm honestly just trying to learn and understand.
[S]Anybody want to help clear things up?[/S]
My friend is pansexual, well she identifies herself as pansexual.
From my understanding she doesn't care about gender what she looks for is what's inside (cheesy enough as it is). If her and that person clicks personality wise, she'll be interested in that person regardless of gender whether it be a girl, boy, transvestite, etc. But yeah, correct if I'm wrong but that's what's pansexual is? While bisexuality is just that you're attracted to male and females. . .
Question change. Let's put this to an example. Say John Doe is attracted to men, women, and hermaphrodites, but NOT those who are androgynous. What sexuality is he, and why? He clearly cares what gender the person is, because he has chosen three. However, he is not strictly attracted to men and women.
What people are saying is that he is NOT bisexual because he does not consider only men and women, but he is NOT pansexual because he does not consider every gender. This is where I get confused.