This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2012-01-29 08:46
Rick Santorum has canceled his Sunday morning campaign appearances because his young daughter has been admitted to the hospital in Philadelphia, a spokesman for Santorum said.
"Rick and his wife Karen are admitting their daughter Bella to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia this evening. The campaign will cancel Rick's upcoming Sunday morning Florida campaign schedule. However, Rick intends to return to Florida and resume the campaign schedule as soon as is possible," Santorum communications director Hogan Gidley said in an email.
Gidley said nothing more should be read into Santorum's scaled-back schedule, explaining: "No one is getting out."
Santorum has spoken frequently about Bella, who has ongoing health issues, during his 2012 campaign.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/santorum-daughter-admitted-to-hospital-112674.html
great
more focus for Mitt romney and Noot Gingrich
with Gingrich leading national polls
a man who despises gay marriage because it's the only marriage he hasn't tried
Note: joke was directed at his 2 divorces, one of which was a cancer patient. currently on his 3rd one
-
TA wrote on 2012-01-29 08:49
Ron Paul needs to win the Republican Primary. I won't vote for either of those jokers and Obama is absolutely out of the question after bypassing Congress and passing ACTA by executive order.
-
Cynic wrote on 2012-01-29 08:51
I'd honestly prefer not having some pro-life douchebag in office.
It really sucks that no other Democrats are running.. the last thing we need is another Republican after Bush.
-
Kollin wrote on 2012-01-29 09:29
All the candidates suck. I wonder if we could hold up without a pres for the next four years till someone decent comes along.....Oh who am I kidding, we would be waiting forever.
-
Science wrote on 2012-01-29 09:31
Quote from Cynic;753444:
I'd honestly prefer not having some pro-life douchebag in office.
It really sucks that no other Democrats are running.. the last thing we need is another Republican after Bush.
Republicans aren't all the same. Bush was a loser, and Romney and Gingrich are both losers too, but Ron Paul is on the other end of the spectrum.
Feel bad for Santorum though, with his daughter in the hospital.
-
EndlessDreams wrote on 2012-01-29 09:37
Quote from Cynic;753444:
I'd honestly prefer not having some pro-life douchebag in office.
It really sucks that no other Democrats are running.. the last thing we need is another Republican after Bush.
No other democrats will have a chance to win against an incumbent.
It would seem like Obama will win again easily with all the Republicans being idiots. Yes, that would also include Ron Paul, and his out of the world policies that doesn't have any touch with reality.
I don't agree with the ACTA or whatever, but the FBI has proved to the world that they don't any new laws to shut down any website they want.
The interesting election will be 2016.
-
Cynic wrote on 2012-01-29 09:38
He's completely pro-life and while he claims to be supportive of gay marriage, he seems more the like "neutral but not actually supportive" type based on what I've read.
Sorry if I don't want a guy like that running my country.
@ Endless; Obama was the best we had until he decided to basically ruin himself by promoting the ACTA.
I've stood by the guy for ages, but this is BS. I'd probably still want him in office above everyone else, but only because there is honestly no better option overall.
-
BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2012-01-29 09:40
Quote from Science;753502:
Republicans aren't all the same. Bush was a loser, and Romney and Gingrich are both losers too, but Ron Paul is on the other end of the spectrum.
Feel bad for Santorum though, with his daughter in the hospital.
Ron Paul's actually off tangent from the American spectrum
he has good ideas but his other stuff sank him
-
EndlessDreams wrote on 2012-01-29 09:42
Quote from Cynic;753516:
H I'd probably still want him in office above everyone else, but only because there is honestly no better option overall.
For some reason, this kind of describes democratic elections pretty well.
All other third party candidates have no chance to even make an appearance, let alone win an election.
-
Science wrote on 2012-01-29 09:43
Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;753518:
Ron Paul's actually off tangent from the American spectrum
he has good ideas but his other stuff sank him
I personally want Obama back in office, just was trying to throw in the point that Cynic's generalization of all Republican candidates wasn't cool :l
-
Cynic wrote on 2012-01-29 09:43
Unfortunately, yeah.
-
TA wrote on 2012-01-29 09:45
Quote from Cynic;753516:
He's completely pro-life and while he claims to be supportive of gay marriage, he seems more the like "neutral but not actually supportive" type based on what I've read.
Sorry if I don't want a guy like that running my country.
@ Endless; Obama was the best we had until he decided to basically ruin himself by promoting the ACTA.
I've stood by the guy for ages, but this is BS. I'd probably still want him in office above everyone else, but only because there is honestly no better option overall.
He's a Statist. He'd let states decide.
Besides, I think Ron Paul is the only one that would actually help the economy. The others are just increasing spending. He's actually cutting it by a trillion his fist year.
Besides, right now... we need someone that will fight for freedoms, the other crap can be dealt with later. And well, Obama is bought and paid for by RIAA/MPAA lobbyists. I've always said he was their lapdog and now the truth is out for all to see.
-
EndlessDreams wrote on 2012-01-29 09:54
Quote from TA;753531:
He's a Statist. He'd let states decide.
Besides, I think Ron Paul is the only one that would actually help the economy. The others are just increasing spending. He's actually cutting it by a trillion his fist year.
Cutting spending means cutting jobs. I don't see how that will help the economy at all. Ron Paul will destroy tons of jobs if he gets elected, and get what he wants.
Complete recall of all troops means that there will be more people in the United States looking for jobs as well.
-
TA wrote on 2012-01-29 10:01
Quote from EndlessDreams;753550:
Cutting spending means cutting jobs. I don't see how that will help the economy at all. Ron Paul will destroy tons of jobs if he gets elected, and get what he wants.
Complete recall of all troops means that there will be more people in the United States looking for jobs as well.
It also means we won't be spending over 500 billion
more than every other country in the world in our military budget every year.
You should actually check out what he plans to do, most of it isn't all that bad. He even told everyone what is happening now would happen way before it happened, but nobody listened.
-
Cucurbita wrote on 2012-01-29 10:06
I don't think Obama even realizes what he did or even understood what ACTA really is.
He didn't know how to work his Nintendo Wii.