Kueh, I ask of you to try to not have puzzles rely on unspecified possibilities. It doesn't count if you specify it in the hints.
I second this. You have to make too many assumptions for some of the riddles.
Makes the puzzle hit or miss depending on which assumptions you take.
You do not know if the ferret has the ability to turn around, nor do you know how far a ferret can turn its tail.
I could make you travel 10 meters with a single hop.
Also the latest puzzle has two possible answers.
As for the latest puzzle having two answers, that was an oversight that I missed while proofreading the solutions, sorry. Either answer will be accepted.
As for the unspecified possibilities, I'm not sure what you're referring to Psyal. Arklian, If you really can do that, you should demonstrate so.
As for the kangaroo puzzle, it doesn't really matter if he can turn or not, since the puzzle says "in whatever direction his tail points." He could have easily acquired the same effect as turning by merely pointing his tail in the direction he wanted to hop. If you need me to specify the fact that he can move his tail, I think you need to be a bit more open to possibilities. Granted, he is made of clockwork, so it's not all that unreasonable of a possibility that he can't, in fact, move his tail, but considering a tail's function, that's unlikely, and, I'll specify it here, not true of Mika.