"Requesting Lock"

This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.

To view other archive projects go to https://archives.mabination.com

Reptile wrote on 2012-10-28 01:53

Quote from Kazuni;970982:
If the OP didn't feel like the discussion was over when you guys started spamming, then it wasn't over. You don't get to decide when a thread is at a point where posting irrelevance is okay.

And I don't think you get the fact that I don't like people locking their own threads. I just happen to hate people who spam up someone else's thread with their own inside jokes and useless posts more.

Okay, you win this round.

[Image: http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2os61J9jB1qdn352.gif]

But it still doesn't change the fact that I think the rule needs to be redefined.
Kazuni wrote on 2012-10-28 02:20

[Image: http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/gallery/yes/eddiemurphyyesnodapprov.gif]

Yes it does need to be redefined.
Cucurbita wrote on 2012-10-28 02:24

But aren't we applying normal thread logic to this situation?

When was the last time we gave a crap about derailing bean rua threads? If he wanted his thread to be taken seriously, he should've posted here instead.

Anyways, I'm really not a fan of control over public platforms, and bean rua was about as free and public as it was supposed to get, so I'm on board for the Hanna-is-right wagon. At this point I wrote a huge fucking analogy over the freedom of discussion but I realized it was too much to read, so I deleted it all and wrote a tldr:

You're all too serious.
Kazuni wrote on 2012-10-28 02:29

Just because someone posted a thread in BR doesn't mean it's okay to chew it up and spit it out. I remember we had a discussion about how BR was supposed to be the "off-topic" forum, and not the "spam" forum. I don't know if that has been changed. Off-topic doesn't mean off-topic in relation to the OP, it means off-topic in relation to the forum.

There are a lot of threads in BR that could be in Everything Else, and vice versa. Giving respect to the thread topic should be universal.
BR means you can make threads like "huehue look at this funny pic of kitae lol" and people can reply with "ahahaha" and "wut", but that doesn't mean you should go putting these posts in every thread there.
Cucurbita wrote on 2012-10-28 02:36

Okay so maybe I should've posted my overly long statement, which was really more of an essay about the ownership of a public discussion, which in this case, would be a thread.

Anyways, I just think we're all a little too uptight these days on the internet. People could really learn to be more laid back.
Lewd wrote on 2012-10-28 03:15

Needs more kush

[video=youtube;4tZrPiHf90w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tZrPiHf90w[/video]
Reptile wrote on 2012-10-28 03:18

Quote from teneshi;971031:
Needs more kush

[video=youtube;4tZrPiHf90w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tZrPiHf90w[/video]

I like you, so don't get in trouble.
Ithiliel wrote on 2012-10-28 04:57

How about we not spam up a thread, in which spam isn't allowed? Lets start with that, boys and girls.

Either keep on topic, or don't post at all.

« First ‹ Prev 1 2 3