H.R. 5741 Slave bill now in Committee

• Spartaaaaa wrote on 2010-07-27 11:10

  H.R. 5741 Slave bill now in Committee
  
  Rob Dew
  Infowars.com
  July 26, 2010
  
  Slavery has a new name: “Mandatory Service”, introduced July 15th 2010 by Charles Rangle.
  
  H.R. 5741 will give the president the authority “To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, and for other purposes.”
  
  Barely a year after introducing H.R. 1444, which was supposed to form a “Congressional Commission on Civic Service to study methods of improving and promoting volunteerism and national service, and for other purposes”, Congress has upped the ante. Anyone between 18 and 42 will be eligible for a two year commitment of civilian or military service. With more college graduates working for the fast food industry, a depression era unemployment rate and less people retiring; the government will have plenty of eligible able bodies to move into the slave ranks.
  
  This echos the sentiment of President Obama who asked Congress in Febuary 2009 to send him a bipartisan bill in the spirit of national service. His Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel outlined a similar plan in his book The Plan.
  
  But even Emanuel aims low looking at only 18 to 25 year olds for three months of compulsory service. Under this new legislation nearly all, able bodied Americans will be sentenced to two years of forced labor. The infrastructure is already in place for those unwilling to participate in mandatory service and now the army is looking to fill it’s ranks with Interment/Resettlement Specialists.
  
  There are very few loopholes to opt of out national service, even CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS (SEC. 109) will be forced to choose the mandatory option of A. noncombatant service (as defined by the President) or B. national civilian service. It seems the congressional commission on civic service will no longer be needed thanks to the hard work of a suspected Congressional tax cheat from New York.
  
  The slavery bill is currently in debate in the House Committee on Armed Services chaired by Rep Ike Skelton a democrat from Missouri. Those who oppose mandatory slavery should contact Rep. Skelton. Many bills die in committee and this bill should meet the same fate.
  

  
  
  Link to article: H.R. 5741 Slave bill now in Committee
• paladin wrote on 2010-07-27 12:12
  Aka The DRAFT!!
  DO NOT WANT
• Hiccup wrote on 2010-07-27 14:14
  OH GOD NOOOOOOOOOO
• Magenera wrote on 2010-07-27 15:57
  Wait I thought this was mandatory already?
• Serathx wrote on 2010-07-27 16:05
  OH HECK NO
• Mrlucky77 wrote on 2010-07-27 16:43
  *stereotypical oriental accent*
  
  EEZ GOOD FOH DISCIPRINE!
  
  /self-racism
• Okami wrote on 2010-07-27 16:53
  HELL NO.
  
  Some people ARE actually doing something with their life. >:l
• Zid wrote on 2010-07-27 17:12
  Suddenly, Canada really looks like a nice place to move into...
• Chockeh wrote on 2010-07-27 19:04
  I'm safe...for now.
• Mrlucky77 wrote on 2010-07-27 19:36

  Quote from Zid;106612:

  Suddenly, Canada really looks like a nice place to move into...

  
  
  Although I love Canada...
  
  [video=youtube;o-g8v9Dp6hQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-g8v9Dp6hQ[/video]
• Arsik wrote on 2010-07-27 22:47
  Guess Obama's administration read Robert A. Heinlein's book Starship Troopers, where you have to serve for the country (in the novel's case, the Terran Federation) before you can be considered a citizen, a citizen being someone able to vote and take part in anything government related. Of course, it's different here because they're making it mandatory instead of optional like in Starship Troopers. I would kinda agree if they did it like they did it in Starship Troopers, but since it's mandatory here, I really don't like it.
  
  Sure, having a good number of those people be recruits could serve them well in the long run, but the military will probably worsen since a lot of the people are there against their own free will, and won't perform as if they enlisted, which could endanger the lives of their fellow soldiers.
• BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-07-27 22:53
  here's a better idea
  mandatory military service is required for the unemployed/not in college in those age range
• starpaw7 wrote on 2010-07-28 18:36
  To Canada!

  [Image: http://a.deviantart.net/avatars/s/u/supacooloniplz.gif?1]
• Chockeh wrote on 2010-07-28 22:41

  Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;106989:

  here's a better idea
  mandatory military service is required for the unemployed/not in college in those age range

  
  An army of neet's, hmmmm...
  Wonder how that will work out.
• Tokiko wrote on 2010-07-29 23:25
  Good thing I'm not 18-26 or well bodied. :D