No you ignore people's arguments and babble on in your own philosophy corner when talking about politics.
You just keeping drinking from that libertarian pool.
Other people: "I believe it's wrong and terrible for people to not receive federal aid after a natural disaster"
You: "It's terrible but the government should stay out so people can take care of themselves"
Other people: "Insurance doesn't cover acts of God and the tornados are not their fault"
You: "But the government should stay out"
This is the same way Reagan lovers are still advocating for trickle down economics and support tax cuts for the rich when we're in 2012 and not the 1980s.
It's logical to think that if rich people have more money, they'll have more money to give to the poor because there's rich people out there who donate to charities.
But alas, it did not turn out that way and the income gap has gone worse.
Hence the Occupy Wall Street movement, and then 1% and 99%
At least Mitt Romney knows what he's saying is wrong, otherwise he would tell everyone the same thing.
Mitt Romney doesn't say the same thing to everyone because he doesn't even believe in what he is saying, he just say what he thinks people want to hear.
I know you don't want to hear what I am saying, and I don't really care if you do or don't. I am just going to tell you this, just because you disagree with my belief doesn't make my belief wrong, neither does it make yours right. I ignore what you say because there is nothing I can contribute to something I just don't agree with.
Some of you want to see the world as what you perceive it to be since your childhood, and refuse to change your opinion even if facts disproving that view is presented. It's ok, this message is for people who have the objectivity and critical thinking that allow them to see the truth in it.
Second of all, the man makes money from these videos. If he wants to be taken seriously, he would write everything down instead of going off as a conspiracy nut. Cherrypicking historical events and then forming a conclusion for people to fully accept and go off of
This link is an example of what people want to see. Everything is written nicely and coherently with images. It is easy to refer back to previous segments of what is said. There are links to sources.
http://www.themoneyparty.org/main/wp...ysis_V1.51.pdf
The cat watched the video and it quickly turned into an anarchist propaganda. The idea of spreading fear is just like the Republicans are doing to the American public. It's like Romney threatening that the GOP Congress will wreck this country if Obama becomes President.
We should not tolerate the fears from extreme nor the people who profit from views of these videos.
I always do my best to avoid arguing with you because I believe if I have nothing nice to say about someone's belief I would rather say nothing, a virtue you clearly don't share.
Some of you want to see the world as what you perceive it to be since your childhood, and refuse to change your opinion even if facts disproving that view is presented. It's ok, this message is for people who have the objectivity and critical thinking that allow them to see the truth in it.
I dono, are the demographic of this forum just too young to care? I dono
And so you're implying that you're more ignorant than Mr. Romney?
Here's a spoon-fed answer; yes. The point of the example was to see that you lack the ability to understand you're wrong when faced with new information that even a sociopath (Mitt Romney) has.
Oh right, because you say it's a truth makes what you believe is true but when other people argue against it, they're wrong
The cat listed reasons with the intentions of the video.
http://mabination.com/threads/62971-Truth-about-US-wars-in-the-past-decade-and-US-economy
If the author makes misleading titles and forms vague buildup from a Youtube video instead of making a direct, serious letter to the government, you can bet their intention is not of good will but rather yellow journalism. Also, he has a donation option on his website.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
you don't share that virtue either
You dismiss everyone else as ignorant just because they don't agree with you and then blame them for not changing their opinion thinking they're no more mentally developed than children.
My opinion on matter is right to me, but I never claim other people should believe what I believe, you try to strong arm your argument one too many time during the whole Ron Paul thing, and eventually turned into just pure accusation with no reasoning behind them, at that point I just give up trying to reason with you, and even now I uphold my judgement.
I dismiss them because none of them gave me a logical counter argument, instead post spiderman pictures. Before you try to say your argument is not illogical, it might as well be, you simply trying to hide your biased opinion behind facts that has no relevancy with the matter in question, like your argument the man is making money off these videos therefore he should be discredited, it sounds logical, but the entire thread is never about the character of the video maker.
Implying you aren't biased in the arguments you make.
http://mabination.com/threads/62971-Truth-about-US-wars-in-the-past-decade-and-US-economy
If the author makes misleading titles and forms vague buildup from a Youtube video instead of making a direct, serious letter to the government, you can bet their intention is not of good will but rather yellow journalism. Also, he has a donation option on his website.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
They are but my logic is not irrelevant to the topic in question. Basically cat's logic is not worth considering because it doesn't coincide with mine.
Fixed.
You don't agree with me, your argument is now invalid :P
I won't listen to reason, just gona stick to my accusation, because like US government taught me, saying accusation enough time, people will eventually believe it to be true.
[Image: http://upurs.us/image/43420.gif]
We found it while we were scavenging for canned goods in the ruins.
"Daddy, what is this?" My son held in his hands a crumpled election poster. "Where did you find this?" I asked."It was in the ash… what does it mean?"
"In the old days, people used to choose a president, a…" I struggled to describe to him the old ways, knowing that it would be completely alien to him. "Someone to lead the country." I said, resignedly.
Who was R-Ron P-", he started. "Ron Paul, I interjected. "He was a man who wanted to save us. But we wouldn't let him."
"Daddy... why are you crying?" he asked me. He was so innocent, despite it all. "No reason". I choked back the tears and crumpled up the flyer. I left it on the ground. Better to forget, I told myself.
"Daddy, I'm hungry"
"I know."