Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Act of 2011

• Kingofrunes wrote on 2012-11-18 23:37
  Just got wind of this a little while ago. The email that linked to this had a much more over zealous tone and made this law sound like it was really dangerous. ("Anti-Protest Bill") is what the email referred to it as and claims that it makes protesting illegal which from reading the article, I think they are really stretching the truth and it's all over nothing as it's clarifying laws already in existence.
  
  Rather than bore you with the quote you can read up on it here:
  
  http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr347enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr347enr.pdf
  
  Obama signed it into bill the other day.
  
  Here's the source of the article I was reading on it:
  
  http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/03/12/44616.htm
  
  Thoughts?
• EndlessDreams wrote on 2012-11-18 23:49
  Sounds like some political party is overreacting. I don't see how this is supposed to be an anti-protest bill. It seems to just reenforce some laws about trespassing and terrorism on government property or something along those lines.
  
  Then again, I am not a lawyer, and I don't have the lawyer vision. I won't able to interpret the universe through 2 pages of revision of some law.