A gaming mouse

• mageisfun wrote on 2013-05-03 16:29
  Hmm, I might just end up buying a keypad to have on the side, and continue using my current logitech mouse, which has a nice feel to it.
• Evaris wrote on 2013-05-03 19:05
  Like this; http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823126050
  or this; http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826153116
• BizarreJuju wrote on 2013-05-03 20:07

  Quote from Evaris;1081487:

  Like this; http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823126050
  or this; http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826153116

  
  
  or this, which im currently using http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823114015
• Evaris wrote on 2013-05-03 23:02

  Quote from BizarreJuju;1081506:

  or this, which im currently using http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16823114015

  
  
  I would argue that the Logitech is better for the price.
• December wrote on 2013-05-04 03:02
  Reminds me of that hilarious thread where people pasted skill icons all over pictures of keyboards and mouses. Icedragons and magnum shot everywhere.
• Kouki wrote on 2013-05-04 03:58

  Quote from Cucurbita;1079085:

  Most 15 dollar mouse nowadays have 1500 dpi dude.
  
  Anyways for mice, if you're on a budget, one of these are really great in the price:quality department. It really is a fantastic mouse. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826104318
  
  A lot of mouse have a huge price markup that doesn't pay off. This actually applies to most "gaming" gear. By giving it some edgy sharp design and calling it "gaming", they can easily attach 20% more dollar value to it.
  
  I'm currently using a hundred dollar sennheiser headphones and its better than any TURTLE BEACH HERP DERP I've tried on.

  
  
  That is true, I mean maybe if someone's super stingy about movement to the very pixel, they'd want a "gaming" mouse, but I personally couldn't feel any difference between a ~$40 Razer Naga and a standard ~$10 basic generic mouse from Target, besides the fact that the Razer was more comfortably shaped for the hand, and had those extra number buttons, but also broke in just a few months. :x
  
  I just advise you to not pay too much for any, unless you really have the money to spare. I think they might be more fragile than a basic mouse, or at least they were in my experience.
• Evaris wrote on 2013-05-04 05:38

  Quote from Fran;1081711:

  That is true, I mean maybe if someone's super stingy about movement to the very pixel, they'd want a "gaming" mouse, but I personally couldn't feel any difference between a ~$40 Razer Naga and a standard ~$10 basic generic mouse from Target, besides the fact that the Razer was more comfortably shaped for the hand, and had those extra number buttons, but also broke in just a few months. :x
  
  I just advise you to not pay too much for any, unless you really have the money to spare. I think they might be more fragile than a basic mouse, or at least they were in my experience.

  
  
  and this is why I'm sticking to my $8 iHome Laser gaming mouse from K-Mart until I can afford an alluminum frame mouse from Corsair with their awesome warranty and sniper button.
• Sumpfkraut wrote on 2013-05-04 06:49

  Quote from Fran;1081711:

  That is true, I mean maybe if someone's super stingy about movement to the very pixel, they'd want a "gaming" mouse, but I personally couldn't feel any difference between a ~$40 Razer Naga and a standard ~$10 basic generic mouse from Target

  
  That's because there was none. Except maybe the fact that you can turn 360° 5 times faster with higher DPI, but I'm not sure where the point in that is when it makes you miss your shots or you race beyond your units you wanted to choose.
  
  Beyond a certain point that has been reached years ago, higher DPI do not discernibly improve accuracy at any normal settings.
• mageisfun wrote on 2013-05-04 19:21
  Well, I just made $60 for 6 hours of work. So, that will be going to my mouse and or keypad, lets up the ante!!