[Image: http://www.japanator.com/elephant/ul/16151-620x-kim_jong_il_01.jpg]
The North Korean government is angry that Japan’s latest apology for colonialism seemed to have only been directed at South Korea. They want Japanese money:
[QUOTE] North Korea — which does not have diplomatic relations with Japan — held a meeting Thursday at the People’s Palace of Culture in Pyongyang in an apparent bid to press for compensation from Japan.
Pumping their fists into the air, North Koreans chanted slogans such as “Compensate,†and “Withdraw,†according to footage aired by television news agency APTN.
Hong Song Ok, chairman of the North’s Committee handling the issue of former sex slaves and victims of forced labour, also accused Japan of trying to cover up its past crimes.
“The Japanese government coldly refuses and ignores the demands of our victims until now,†Hong said at the People’s Palace of Culture — where portraits of North Korean leader Kim Jong Il and his late father Kim Il Sung hang together.
When Japan normalized relations with South Korea in the 1960’s, some millions of dollars in reparations was paid to Seoul. North Korea has yet to receive reparations payments from Japan, and Kim Jong-il would obviously like to receive some money on behalf of the victims of Japanese colonialism.
I’ve read that reparations were almost considered during the Koizumi years, but the emergence of the abduction issue and nuclear weapons program pretty much killed the idea. It would also seem pretty ridiculous to pay the DPRK compensation while it forces its own citizens into labor camps and sexual slavery.
—
In other apology news, the South Korean government is under fire because it reported Prime Minister Kan said Japan would “return/restore†[返還] artifacts when the actual Japanese term was something more like “hand over†or “give†[引渡/ãŠæ¸¡ã— ].
Kan pledged his government will “transfer†historical artifacts seized during the colonial period between 1910 and 1945, but the Foreign Ministry quoted Kan as saying it will “return†them, and even highlighted the word in bold in a press release.
Japan’s position so far has been that all claims for restitution were settled under the Korea-Japan Normalization Treaty in 1965. The word “return†would imply that Tokyo now recognizes the illegality of taking the treasures and could open the way for a massive repatriation of looted artifacts. But Japan avoided the delicate issue with the word “transfer.â€
Any readers who know more details about how the particular historical artifacts in question (royal texts from the Chosun Dynasty?) found their way to Japan? [/QUOTE]
North Korea Wants an Apology | Japan Probe
TL;DR?
South Korea received an official apology and the Korean artifacts obtained during the colonialism in World War 2. North Korea want some of that loot.
North Korea shouldn't be given an apology or money
knowing the government, they'll just spend the money on weapons
What about the Japanese people they abducted?
North Korean abductions of Japanese - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia