Some rule changes and signature discussions

• Gensokyou wrote on 2013-08-02 12:21
  Is there any reason why we can't have obnoxiously long spoiler tags in sigs?
  
  Just wondering if there's any technical reason or if it's a personal choice.
• Kingofrunes wrote on 2013-08-02 12:47

  Quote from Gensokyou;1130703:

  Is there any reason why we can't have obnoxiously long spoiler tags in sigs?
  
  Just wondering if there's any technical reason or if it's a personal choice.

  
  
  I think it's good to be courteous to people on low bandwidth. Even if you put a shit ton of stuff in spoiler tags. The end users browser will still fetch that content.
• Osayidan wrote on 2013-08-02 12:56

  Quote from Gensokyou;1130703:

  Is there any reason why we can't have obnoxiously long spoiler tags in sigs?
  
  Just wondering if there's any technical reason or if it's a personal choice.

  
  
  Primary reason is if it stretches longer than 300 pixels people won't even see it past the 300 pixels anyways so what exactly is the point? Then there's file size to consider, regardless of what is in your signature the entire contents shouldn't exceed 1.5 MB.
  
  Personal reason: It's fucking annoying because of the above 2 mentioned technical points.
• Froglord of DESTINY!!! wrote on 2013-08-02 20:12
  Does it really matter if we suggest to complain on nexon's forums anyways?
  
  Osay did Ip block them, and they technically consider us as a "omghaxorgroupunofficialfansight.wmv"
• Ashikoki wrote on 2013-08-02 22:40

  Quote from Froglord of DESTINY!!!;1130783:

  Does it really matter if we suggest to complain on nexon's forums anyways?
  
  Osay did Ip block them, and they technically consider us as a "omghaxorgroupunofficialfansight.wmv"

  
  
  It does matter and it would be very silly to say it shouldn't.
  
  We won't push our problems away to people who don't want them either, even if we're not affiliated or on the friendliest of terms.
• Gensokyou wrote on 2013-08-02 22:56

  Quote from Osayidan;1130719:

  Primary reason is if it stretches longer than 300 pixels people won't even see it past the 300 pixels anyways so what exactly is the point? Then there's file size to consider, regardless of what is in your signature the entire contents shouldn't exceed 1.5 MB.
  
  Personal reason: It's fucking annoying because of the above 2 mentioned technical points.

  
  
  Oh, so it's hardcoded for vbulliten or whatever we use that sigs are 300 pixels or less?
  
  I recall seeing someone with a really super long image though.
• Ashikoki wrote on 2013-08-02 23:04

  Quote from Gensokyou;1130819:

  Oh, so it's hardcoded for vbulliten or whatever we use that sigs are 300 pixels or less?
  
  I recall seeing someone with a really super long image though.

  
  
  It is, starting now. Supposedly.
  
  The size rule (supposedly) enforces itself now. But we're still going to enforce the 1.5MB rule. I don't think I will bother enforcing the width rule, since no one really cares.
• Gensokyou wrote on 2013-08-02 23:05

  Quote from Ashikoki;1130823:

  It is, starting now. Supposedly.

  
  
  

  [Image: https://si0.twimg.com/profile_images/1774968395/futuramafry.jpg]

  
  
  That sounds...suspicious. It's a conspiracy!
• Osayidan wrote on 2013-08-02 23:06

  Quote from Gensokyou;1130824:

  [Image: https://si0.twimg.com/profile_images/1774968395/futuramafry.jpg]

  
  
  That sounds...suspicious. It's a conspiracy!

  
  
  Yes, when I opened up mabination 3 years ago this was my ultimate plan. Now you're all slaves to my signature size restrictions.
• Gensokyou wrote on 2013-08-03 01:22

  Quote from Osayidan;1130825:

  Yes, when I opened up mabination 3 years ago this was my ultimate plan. Now you're all slaves to my signature size restrictions.

  
  
  NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOW WE WILL NEVER GET TO HAVE LARGE SIGNATURES DUE TO THIS TYRANNY! ;--------------;