Quote from RebeccaBlack;1156588:
I think communication is ideal and this really isn't the "best" way to go about it, but I don't think it's terribly harmful either. Obviously it's not necessarily his fault. Of course he could have a crappy home life. There are so many factors. But people also hold some responsibility for their actions even if they've suffered.
I pretty much hold the view that most parents should seriously relax and accept that their own kid is an individual with their own personality. The problem is that many parents want to really control their children and form them around a certain set of rules and behaviors to suit them as if the child is an extension of themselves. My opinion is that those people should buy a dog and stop fucking with their kids.
If what I am thinking is true (I have no way of verify). Then the son is a symptom bearer. Consider a family a system, when some part of the system doesn't work, the error in the system is exhibited through a symptom bearer. That's where the troubles come from, but fixing the symptom bearer will not fix the system, as a result the error in the system will simply manifest itself in someone else within the system or resurface in the son.
If this is indeed the case (From what I can tell, if father is making his son do this then it is quite likely an error in the family system). Anyway, if this is indeed the case, you can only fix the system by going for the system changer. This is someone within the system who has the ability to change status quo. I assume in this case that'd be the father.
The reason why I suggested talking is because that's the only way to be sure if there is something wrong, and if I am a mediator in this case, I would find out the system changer and the error and work on that instead of the symptom bearer. That's why I think discipline the son might be a waste of time.