This has been a public service announcement.
do people even know who i am? I am like an unknown lurker of Nation. ;-;
Noted.
I dont speak to meanies o3o
do people even know who i am? I am like an unknown lurker of Nation. ;-;
WOWOWOW SO RUDE :C
I don't know you but now you're a meanie so i dont want to know you o3o
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Maku's statements. Let's get down to brass tacks: It's amazing to me that Maku's intimates actually assert that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Not only must such people be mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration, but if Maku doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to make the pot of oligarchism overboil and scald the whole world, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Maku will grasp the concept that he is doing everything in his power to make me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of sexist deviants. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Maku may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Maku has secretly been creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. This is, of course, a scandal and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I expect to find that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst sorts of cuckoo half-wits there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and obviously difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Mr. Maku uses emotional arguments rather than rational debate to convince people that his vices are the only true virtues.
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Maku's statements. Let's get down to brass tacks: It's amazing to me that Maku's intimates actually assert that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Not only must such people be mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration, but if Maku doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to make the pot of oligarchism overboil and scald the whole world, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Maku will grasp the concept that he is doing everything in his power to make me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of sexist deviants. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Maku may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Maku has secretly been creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. This is, of course, a scandal and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I expect to find that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst sorts of cuckoo half-wits there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and obviously difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Mr. Maku uses emotional arguments rather than rational debate to convince people that his vices are the only true virtues.
Your the rude one being a meanie to everyone.
Meanies are so mean :C
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Maku's statements. Let's get down to brass tacks: It's amazing to me that Maku's intimates actually assert that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Not only must such people be mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration, but if Maku doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to make the pot of oligarchism overboil and scald the whole world, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Maku will grasp the concept that he is doing everything in his power to make me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of sexist deviants. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Maku may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Maku has secretly been creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. This is, of course, a scandal and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I expect to find that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst sorts of cuckoo half-wits there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and obviously difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Mr. Maku uses emotional arguments rather than rational debate to convince people that his vices are the only true virtues.
Your the rude one being a meanie to everyone.
Meanies are so mean :C
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Maku's statements. Let's get down to brass tacks: It's amazing to me that Maku's intimates actually assert that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Not only must such people be mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration, but if Maku doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to make the pot of oligarchism overboil and scald the whole world, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Maku will grasp the concept that he is doing everything in his power to make me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of sexist deviants. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Maku may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Maku has secretly been creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. This is, of course, a scandal and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I expect to find that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst sorts of cuckoo half-wits there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and obviously difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Mr. Maku uses emotional arguments rather than rational debate to convince people that his vices are the only true virtues.
I don't know how to tell you this, but I profess that people who work with Compass's representatives discredit themselves. To start, to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of revolting busybodies it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but I have frequently criticized Compass's unspoken plan to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of Leninism, mandarinism, child molestation, and halitosis. Compass hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Compass believes that it is everyone's obligation to up the ante considerably. That view is anathema to the cause of liberty. If it is not loudly refuted our future will be dire indeed.
To cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose is an injustice. The significance of this is that when you tell Compass's apologists that those of us whose reason and honor have not been vitiated recognize that I find it amusing how all thinking people simultaneously flinched when they heard Compass insist that violence and prejudice are funny, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that we must do everything we can to cast a ray of light on his self-righteous views. Fortunately, dispensing justice is an activity that's right in my wheelhouse. I even know where to begin: by informing people everywhere that his cold, analytical approach to egotism doesn't take into account the human element. In particular, those who have been hurt by egotism know that Compass, in his infinite wisdom, has decided to shackle us with the chains of McCarthyism. In this case, one cannot help but recall that Compass's disquisitions are written in a peculiar doublespeak that is hard for the uninitiated to understand. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical over which Compass has any control. But that's inconsequential because Compass will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as “hateful†or “unmannerlyâ€. That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.
Compass is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. While some of Compass's crusades are very attractive on the surface and are doubtlessly entertaining, they ultimately serve to suborn scurrilous, inhumane cheapskates to con us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. It's Compass's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a yawping, brutal idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that my fantasy is to immerse myself in the grandeur and greatness of the pre-Compass world, a world in which it was unfathomable that anyone could desire to destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system. As you've no doubt gathered, realizing such a fantasy requires looking into the future and considering what will happen if we let Compass change the course of history.
While you or I might find it natural to want to change the direction in which our society is headed, implying that unconscionable lie-virtuosi are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive is no different from implying that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an officious nabob of Chekism deserving of death and damnation. Both statements are ludicrous. While we do nothing, those who do everything possible to keep disgusting, mealymouthed racketeers of one sort or another louche and fatuous are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we give our young people the values that will inspire them to combat the wishy-washy ideology of exclusionism that has infected the minds of so many neurotic schmucks.
Actually, ethically bankrupt worrywarts are deeply impressed by Compass's guff. That represents yet more evidence—as if we needed more—that he seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that Compass's prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse. Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should surely mention that Compass is trying to hold himself up as a cultural icon. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if he didn't, you might come to realize that if you can make any sense out his putrid, nutty circulars then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. I despise everything about him. I despise his attempts to deprive individuals of the right to rake him over the coals for extracting obscene salaries and profits from corporations that skewer me over a pit barbecue. I despise how he insists that he is a master of precognition, psychokinesis, remote viewing, and other undeveloped human capabilities. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that his comrades have tried repeatedly to assure me that he will eventually tire of his plan to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good and will then step aside and let us advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between “don't hold your breath†and “beware of flying pigsâ€. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
This is to voice my dissatisfaction with Mr. Maku's statements. Let's get down to brass tacks: It's amazing to me that Maku's intimates actually assert that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. Not only must such people be mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration, but if Maku doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to make the pot of oligarchism overboil and scald the whole world, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Maku will grasp the concept that he is doing everything in his power to make me languish along beneath the thousand eyes of sexist deviants. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. Maku may believe that he can lie with impunity. He may even have gotten away with telling more lies than we can count. But Maku has secretly been creating an atmosphere of mistrust in which speculations and rumors gain the appearance of viability and compete openly with more carefully considered theories. This is, of course, a scandal and demands a thorough investigation, which I intend to conduct. I expect to find that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst sorts of cuckoo half-wits there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. Finally, this has been a good deal of reading, and obviously difficult reading at that. Still, I hope you walk away from it with the new knowledge that Mr. Maku uses emotional arguments rather than rational debate to convince people that his vices are the only true virtues.
I don't know how to tell you this, but I profess that people who work with Compass's representatives discredit themselves. To start, to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of revolting busybodies it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but I have frequently criticized Compass's unspoken plan to punish dissent through intimidation, public ridicule, economic exclusion, imprisonment, and most extremely, death. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of Leninism, mandarinism, child molestation, and halitosis. Compass hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that Compass believes that it is everyone's obligation to up the ante considerably. That view is anathema to the cause of liberty. If it is not loudly refuted our future will be dire indeed.
To cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose is an injustice. The significance of this is that when you tell Compass's apologists that those of us whose reason and honor have not been vitiated recognize that I find it amusing how all thinking people simultaneously flinched when they heard Compass insist that violence and prejudice are funny, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that we must do everything we can to cast a ray of light on his self-righteous views. Fortunately, dispensing justice is an activity that's right in my wheelhouse. I even know where to begin: by informing people everywhere that his cold, analytical approach to egotism doesn't take into account the human element. In particular, those who have been hurt by egotism know that Compass, in his infinite wisdom, has decided to shackle us with the chains of McCarthyism. In this case, one cannot help but recall that Compass's disquisitions are written in a peculiar doublespeak that is hard for the uninitiated to understand. The mere mention of that fact guarantees that this letter will never get published in any mass-circulation periodical over which Compass has any control. But that's inconsequential because Compass will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as “hateful†or “unmannerlyâ€. That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise.
Compass is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. While some of Compass's crusades are very attractive on the surface and are doubtlessly entertaining, they ultimately serve to suborn scurrilous, inhumane cheapskates to con us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. It's Compass's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a yawping, brutal idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that my fantasy is to immerse myself in the grandeur and greatness of the pre-Compass world, a world in which it was unfathomable that anyone could desire to destroy all tradition, all morality, and the entire democratic system. As you've no doubt gathered, realizing such a fantasy requires looking into the future and considering what will happen if we let Compass change the course of history.
While you or I might find it natural to want to change the direction in which our society is headed, implying that unconscionable lie-virtuosi are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive is no different from implying that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an officious nabob of Chekism deserving of death and damnation. Both statements are ludicrous. While we do nothing, those who do everything possible to keep disgusting, mealymouthed racketeers of one sort or another louche and fatuous are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we give our young people the values that will inspire them to combat the wishy-washy ideology of exclusionism that has infected the minds of so many neurotic schmucks.
Actually, ethically bankrupt worrywarts are deeply impressed by Compass's guff. That represents yet more evidence—as if we needed more—that he seems unable to think of turns of speech that aren't hackneyed. What really grates on my nerves, however, is that Compass's prose consists less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning than of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated henhouse. Of course, in a discussion of this type, one should surely mention that Compass is trying to hold himself up as a cultural icon. He will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if he didn't, you might come to realize that if you can make any sense out his putrid, nutty circulars then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. I despise everything about him. I despise his attempts to deprive individuals of the right to rake him over the coals for extracting obscene salaries and profits from corporations that skewer me over a pit barbecue. I despise how he insists that he is a master of precognition, psychokinesis, remote viewing, and other undeveloped human capabilities. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that his comrades have tried repeatedly to assure me that he will eventually tire of his plan to extend an upas shadow over all that is right and good and will then step aside and let us advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals. When that will happen is unclear—probably sometime between “don't hold your breath†and “beware of flying pigsâ€. I could be wrong about any or all of this, but at the moment, the above fits what I know of history, people, and current conditions. If anyone sees anything wrong or has some new facts or theories on this, I'd love to hear about them.
WTF? TL'DR WHATS GOING ON WITH THE LONG POSTS