Treasure Dungeons are p2w content.

• Tyskiyomy wrote on 2014-09-14 03:58

  Quote from mikecharizard;1247131:

  So apparently you can run the same treasure dungeon more than once and get rewards for it if you're fast enough o-o

  
  Its the ultimate[for me at least] explore exp farm if you find one near a land mark since the goddess wing will warp you to that mark and it's just spam fo' days
  
  I'm probably gunna rack up on boxes for once my talent goes away.
• Zekkii wrote on 2014-09-14 04:03
  They could at least give the ability to a free talent, most likely Adventurer.
• Mystickskye wrote on 2014-09-14 04:46

  Quote from Lunamaniac;1247039:

  Somehow I think I've heard of worse crimes.

  That's sort of my point. If he's the guy I'm thinking of he wanted a redirect and a wiki mod said it probably wasn't worth it and he got really salty about it, leading to the earlier comment about the wiki mods being special.
• Zekkii wrote on 2014-09-14 05:08

  Quote from Mystickskye;1247165:

  That's sort of my point. If he's the guy I'm thinking of he wanted a redirect and a wiki mod said it probably wasn't worth it and he got really salty about it, leading to the earlier comment about the wiki mods being special.

  
  Keep provoking me and making assumptions, three more guesses and you might get to the real reason why I said. I'll give you a hint, it's one of the main reasons why the wiki is so inaccurate. Figured it out? Good job, keep it to yourself or PM me so I can delete it. We're done here, for everyone's sake.
• Mystickskye wrote on 2014-09-14 06:34
  Were your parents a special snowflake and a drama llama or something?
• Jake wrote on 2014-09-14 07:01

  Quote from Mystickskye;1247177:

  Were your parents a special snowflake and a drama llama or something?

  
  
  seems as if it's you who is attempting to start drama. Zekkii is simply trying to avoid conflict (although in a slightly aggressive manner, but it's pretty normal to react in such a way after having been provoked)
• Mystickskye wrote on 2014-09-14 07:07
  The drama and provocation started when "someone" bitched about the wiki and complained that the people there were too hard to work with (and lol if you don't think that last reply of his was anything but dramatic) when there doesn't seem to be evidence of that in context of the one complaining.
  
  Even Aubog chipped in in his own way and regardless of his reputation elsewhere he's a welcome and (used to be) regular contributor that did good work.
• Sinned wrote on 2014-09-14 07:14
  Seems the best solution would be to create an alt to do treasure dungeon and pet move the coins as people have mentioned earlier. With exploration going up to level 50 now, seems like a waste to not get as much exp as you can possible to get more AP.
• Jake wrote on 2014-09-14 07:24

  Quote from Mystickskye;1247181:

  The drama and provocation started when "someone" bitched about the wiki and complained that the people there were too hard to work with (and lol if you don't think that last reply of his was anything but dramatic) when there doesn't seem to be evidence of that in context of the one complaining.

  
  
  Well maybe you'll get what you want if you keep trying to poke at it i guess. dunno what your goals are with this lol
  
  Seems like there's salt on both sides at this point!
  
  

  Quote from Sinned;1247184:

  Uh....
  
  
  Just saying.
  

  
  
  Noted.
• Mystickskye wrote on 2014-09-14 07:32

  Quote from Jake;1247185:

  dunno what your goals are with this lol

  Essentially, if you have an issue with the wiki and just sit back and complain without really trying to make things better then you're a dick because the whole point of the wiki is that it's a community effort to help the community. Even certain banned users have evaded the ban to try and further contribute to the wiki and given that they don't throw a shitstorm they're allowed to because again, the whole point of the wiki is that the community works together to help the community.
  
  If you don't try to work with the wiki and talk shit about it then you're actively working against this.
• Zekkii wrote on 2014-09-14 07:39

  Quote from Sinned;1247184:

  Uh....
  
  
  Just saying.

  
  In context I was justifying Code because you swore at him. Next time I'll just report instead of getting involved.
• Sinned wrote on 2014-09-14 07:49

  Quote from Zekkii;1247189:

  In context I was justifying Code because you swore at him. Next time I'll just report instead of getting involved.

  
  
  Uh, I really hate going off topic, but you can't justify me saying that I swore at Code.
  
  First of all, I quoted newpants, which does not equal Code.
  Secondly, I quoted only that specific part and mention in a broader sense that it is a common issue in which people don't contribute things that could better our main information source. If anybody should be offended, it's OP because I pulled that specific portion from his post and it could be possible for him to be offended by my remark.
  Third, Code posted after I did. I don't know how I swore at him when he posted after I did.
  
  I'm sorry but I can't seem to find the logic behind your argument. If you're wrong or misinterpreted something, just admit it and move on with it.
  =====
  On Topic:
  
  If yall really want it, make a suggestion on Nexon forum. Show you want it. Nexon may or may not do anything, but it's better than sitting there and whining about it.
• Zekkii wrote on 2014-09-14 07:52
  Okay so you swore at newpants and I was backing him up with Code, it doesn't make much difference.
• Sinned wrote on 2014-09-14 08:15

  Quote from Zekkii;1247196:

  Okay so you swore at newpants and I was backing him up with Code, it doesn't make much difference.

  
  
  It makes a huge difference. Those are 2 completely different statements with different implications.
  
  Not to mention I feel like you completely ignored my remark a la Fox News. I specifically mention that I said to help edit in the broadest sense, not targeting anybody. The only reason why OP would feel offended is if he feels that it's specifically targeted to him because it quoted him when I was trying to get that specific point on.
  
  But he hasn't said a thing from what I've noted (and I could be wrong here), but either he doesn't care, he hasn't seen it or he realizes the general point I'm trying to make. In which case, I commend him for being an adult about it since I put him in good faith to understand that I meant no offense to him and even if I did, that it's not a huge offense in one would provoke a Shakespearean duel with.
  
  I'd prefer if you'd just admit your mistakes and walk away, or just walk away if you truly think you're right. I'd much rather go back to the topic at hand than guide someone who just ignored the key point to my argument.
• Kingofrunes wrote on 2014-09-14 11:56

  Quote from k1nsoo;1247190:

  I appreciate wiki (I still think its the best source to get skill/content info) but lately a lot of new stuff has been very inaccurate. You guys should have "evidence section" for editing or else a lot of skill/contents will be still inaccurate. Did I mention I've fixed "inaccurate" data and next day it was changed back by someone else?

  
  
  That's what the Discussion page is for, that's all I'll say on the topic of the wiki.