This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
Campylobacter jejuni wrote on 2014-09-13 19:42
And it can even relate to their own field of expertise...
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Judy_Wood
Judy Wood Ph.D. is a materials scientist and former assistant professor of mechanical engineering. She earned her doctorate in materials engineering science from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia, in 1992. Her dissertation was on the topic of thermal stresses in bimaterial joints.
Dr Wood's observation of the destruction of the World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 led her to the conviction that the towers did not collapse but were "dustified" by a directed energy weapon. According to her, dustification involves molecular dissociation and transmutation.
In a whole series of lectures and media appearances[1], Wood has maintained that the debris pile was nowhere near tall enough to account for the aggregate mass of the towers and their contents. Rather, she states, the towers were pulverized[2] in mid-air and simply blew away on the breeze.
On her web site, Wood presents a 41-point list of "The principal evidence that must be explained." It includes (point 9) "The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth", and (point 6) "The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition."[3]
She consistently declines to speculate about the exact nature of the weapon involved[4], where it was situated or who operated it. Her position is that, as a scientist, her role is to determine what happened that day. Others might or might not address those more political questions.
In 2010 her 544-page book Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 was published by "The New Investigation."[5][6][7]
-
Osayidan wrote on 2014-09-13 19:47
I don't believe the entirety of the official story, but I find even that to be too crazy.
Almost on the level of this guy:
[Image: http://i.imgur.com/kMb0Weu.jpg]
-
Chiyuri wrote on 2014-09-13 20:20
Why not.
-
TLCBonaparte wrote on 2014-09-14 03:27
So the alien from independent day blew it up... I am ok with that.
-
Aubog007 wrote on 2014-09-14 12:16
Quote from Osayidan;1247083:
I don't believe the entirety of the official story, but I find even that to be too crazy.
Almost on the level of this guy:
[Image: http://i.imgur.com/kMb0Weu.jpg]
That poor bastard gave the worst look and the worst phrase at the worst possible timing to look like the world's most stoned stoner.
-
Mentosftw wrote on 2014-09-14 15:30
I'd like to think people were crazy to begin with.
Title should be "Even lunatics can be scientists."
-
Campylobacter jejuni wrote on 2014-09-15 02:15
The point is that you shouldn't take things for granted just because a scientist or even a bunch of scientists says it is so.
-
EndlessDreams wrote on 2014-09-16 03:02
Direct energy weapon? Obviously, it was the Gundam from Japan that collapsed the 2 towers.
The fact that she is a scientist is +9000 credibility. More credible than any other non-scientist lunatic.
The fact that it was from the internet double that credibility as well.
-
Invisible wrote on 2014-09-16 03:43
No great mind ever existed without a touch of madness. Just as Galileo was shunned for his claim that the earth revolves around the sun, maybe Wood will be regarded as one of the greatest minds in history.
Nah. Probably not.
-
Campylobacter jejuni wrote on 2014-09-16 10:53
I'm pretty sure the original publication was not on the internet.
-
TLCBonaparte wrote on 2014-09-16 14:16
Quote from Mentosftw;1247244:
I'd like to think people were crazy to begin with.
Title should be "Even lunatics can be scientists."
Insanity is simply a perception that's different from the norm. Sanity is not set in stone. Our reality is defined by communication, everything is relative.