More new Pokemon revealed

• User495 wrote on 2010-06-12 19:33

  Quote from Phunkie;61393:

  Unown.
  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/201.png]

  
  
  Other post-Generation 2 Pokemon:
  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/293.png]

  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/341.png]

  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/460.png]

  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/449.png]

  
  
  Ken Sugimori can make them [SIZE="5"]all[/SIZE] have that classic look and feel. It's just the designs get more inventive with every generation.
  
  A Pokemon with a huge flower on its back.
  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/003.png]

  
  
  A walking continent.
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/389.png]

  
  
  
  Each Pokemon is based off something in RL, usually. Look them up. The creators aren't getting "bored." They're just picking up new ideas always.
  
  Venusaur -
  
  
  
  Torterra -
  
  
  
  No, they're not getting bored. They're using newer myths and legends, and incorporating some of that new knowledge into the newer Pokemon games. And that's actually pretty cool.
  
  They're also using new creatures. Zebras, pigeons, chinchillas! But all you guys do is whine, whine, whine. You apparently want them to use the same old creatures again.
  
  More lizards with flames on their tails?
  
  

  [Image: http://www.gtsplus.net/files/images/art/sugimori/004.png]

  
  
  [SIZE="4"]Come on now.[/SIZE]

  
  
  And I'm sorry, but there's nothing quite interesting about Raticate besides its Super Fang attack. Or Fearow. Or Seaking, for godssakes. The 151 first Pokemon were classic, but we're past those. Bring in the new. As crazy as they look.
  
  This is 2010. I want my Pokemon to look f***ing badass. :glasses:

  
  
  
  
  agreed xD I like something new, and if they don't look that good so what? we can still use old pokemon, that and diversity is a good thing
  
  (I only said they didn't appeal to me <-<;) xD
• Time wrote on 2010-06-12 20:06
  since yesterday when I wasnt sure about any of them, I have grown more accustomed to them, EXCEPT For that fire man pig (OMG MAN BEAR PIG) and the psychic pig, I just wont use them though...
• Moppy wrote on 2010-06-12 20:09

  Quote from Timexpo;61622:

  since yesterday when I wasnt sure about any of them, I have grown more accustomed to them, EXCEPT For that fire man pig (OMG MAN BEAR PIG) and the psychic pig, I just wont use them though...

  
  
  Agreed. Those two look HORRIBLE.
• Tedio wrote on 2010-06-12 21:39
  meh, the pink thing is just odd to me.
  
  Better evolve into something awesome.
• Phunkie wrote on 2010-06-12 22:08
  Holy crap, the Crocodile has an AMAZING ability.
  
  

  Meguroko (メグロコ) is the Desert Crocodile Pokemon, a Ground / Dark type. Its abilities are Intimidate and "Earthquake Spiral," the latter of which raises its Attack stat when it Knocks Out a Pokemon.

  
  
  And here's an interesting fact. :)
  
  See that pig-looking thing with the floral designs?
  
  

  [Image: http://pokebeach.com/news/0610/munma.jpg]

  
  
  
  Read the following:
  
  

  Now this is quite interesting. Was Munma referenced in the first generation games? After you defeat a Lass outside of Rock Tunnel in Red, Green, Blue, Yellow, and their remakes, she tells you...
  
  "The POKEMON here are so chunky! There should be a pink one with a floral pattern!"
  
  Quite the random description, with no Pokemon since now ever fitting it. There has been a rumor circulating on the Internet for years and years that Gamefreak originally created more than 1,000 Pokemon designs, and while we know that some Pokemon were delayed a generation (like Shellos and Gastrodon, originally for Ruby and Sapphire), who would think that after almost 15 years they would actually use a concept from that far back? Was Mun'ma a rough idea that long ago or even a near-complete design? Seems like Gamefreak is really scraping the barrel if that's the case. Regardless, it's astounding that Red and Green from 1996 now reference a Pokemon from 2010. Thanks go to Zierant from our forums for notifying us of this.

  
  
  Munma Referenced in First Generation Games? (June 11th, 2010) « Games News « Pok�Beach
  
  
  
  Also, there are rumors that there will be 157 new Pokemon, bringing the total to 650.
  
  And that Tauros will evolve into Minotauros, standing on two legs.
  
  Just rumors for now. But MORE POKEMON = HOTTTT! :2thumb:
• Kyouriharu wrote on 2010-06-12 22:52

  Quote from Phunkie;61726:

  Holy crap, the Crocodile has an AMAZING ability.

  
  
  Took the words right out of my mouth. If it has an evolved form of it, I'm probably going to main it.
  
  Also I like the gears, they just have bleh abilities. Dunno why but I found steel pokemon amusing.
• Piko wrote on 2010-06-12 22:58

  Quote from Phunkie;61726:

  And that Tauros will evolve into Minotauros, standing on two legs.

  
  
  If this rumor is true, Tauros will become a total bad ass and will be on my team if it looks epik.
• pkMaster wrote on 2010-06-12 23:20

  Quote from Phunkie;61726:

  
  

  [Image: http://pokebeach.com/news/0610/munma.jpg]

  
  
  Read the following:
  
  

  Now this is quite interesting. Was Munma referenced in the first generation games? After you defeat a Lass outside of Rock Tunnel in Red, Green, Blue, Yellow, and their remakes, she tells you...
  
  "The POKEMON here are so chunky! There should be a pink one with a floral pattern!"
  
  Quite the random description, with no Pokemon since now ever fitting it. There has been a rumor circulating on the Internet for years and years that Gamefreak originally created more than 1,000 Pokemon designs, and while we know that some Pokemon were delayed a generation (like Shellos and Gastrodon, originally for Ruby and Sapphire), who would think that after almost 15 years they would actually use a concept from that far back? Was Mun'ma a rough idea that long ago or even a near-complete design? Seems like Gamefreak is really scraping the barrel if that's the case. Regardless, it's astounding that Red and Green from 1996 now reference a Pokemon from 2010. Thanks go to Zierant from our forums for notifying us of this.

  
  
  Munma Referenced in First Generation Games? (June 11th, 2010) « Games News « Pok�Beach
  

  
  
  Dang, that's just awesome. I feel like revisiting Pokemon Yellow just to see this quote. I should probably check out PokeBeach more often.
• Arsik wrote on 2010-06-12 23:27
  I don't know about you guys, but that pink thing has grown on me. Nothing like a giant flowered tick thing that could possibly pass as a Headcrab to say "I got a badass team, so don't mess with me." :D
• Chockeh wrote on 2010-06-12 23:27

  Quote from Phunkie;61726:

  Holy crap, the Crocodile has an AMAZING ability.
  
  
  
  And here's an interesting fact. :)
  
  See that pig-looking thing with the floral designs?
  
  

  [Image: http://pokebeach.com/news/0610/munma.jpg]

  
  
  
  Read the following:
  
  
  
  Munma Referenced in First Generation Games? (June 11th, 2010) « Games News « Pok�Beach
  
  
  
  Also, there are rumors that there will be 157 new Pokemon, bringing the total to 650.
  
  And that Tauros will evolve into Minotauros, standing on two legs.
  
  Just rumors for now. But MORE POKEMON = HOTTTT! :2thumb:

  That's kinda cool.
• Phunkie wrote on 2010-06-13 00:46
  Haha, I am in love with this little guy. Soooo cute.
  
  

  [Image: http://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/7/7e/Chiramii.png]
• pkMaster wrote on 2010-06-13 01:00
  Ya know, the more I look at the pink pig thing, the more I think it looks like a giant sized bed bug. I'm probably just weird like that though.
• Phunkie wrote on 2010-06-13 01:04
  It looks like an actual Pokemon egg to me. If it didn't have the mouth, feet and eyes, that is.
  
  Reminds me of Chansey.