[CH/NA] Missed your chance at Dragon? No worries!

• Craddle wrote on 2011-10-25 19:56

  Quote from Soluna:

  Ver2. of Thunder Dragon Pet Coming your way, and better than ever! It is a 2 person mount!
  
  

  [Image: http://image.tiancity.com/article/UserFiles/Image/luoqi/201110/25/04/002.jpg]

  
  

  [Image: http://image.tiancity.com/article/UserFiles/Image/luoqi/201110/25/04/003.jpg]

  
  

  [Image: http://image.tiancity.com/article/UserFiles/Image/luoqi/201110/25/04/004.jpg]

  
  
  Stats:
  Bag： 6x10
  Summon Time： 120 Min
  HP: 80
  Mana: 39
  Stamina: 77
  Str: 47
  Int: 32
  Dex: 36
  Will: 40
  Luck: 29

  
  
  Source
  
  2 person Thunder Dragon currently being released in Mabinogi China.:cheer:
• Kenny? wrote on 2011-10-25 20:09
  Lol the second person looks so content :D
• truefire wrote on 2011-10-25 20:12
  I would buy that mount just to have my passenger look completely distraught while flying.
• Dejosa wrote on 2011-10-25 20:15
  [FONT="Century Gothic"]inb4outragouspriceforthedragonagain.
  
  :whistle:[/FONT]
• Misaka wrote on 2011-10-25 20:20
  I like these dragons already.
• Hamsium wrote on 2011-10-25 20:20

  Quote from truefire;635061:

  I would buy that mount just to have my passenger look completely distraught while flying.

  
  
  ^^^A thousand times this.
  I was disappointed with my fourth black fire horse but happy with the name, I'd take this as an alternative. :E
• MiniSoda wrote on 2011-10-25 20:27
  Is the flying speed the same as 1 person dragon?
• Adrianblade wrote on 2011-10-25 20:37
  Why have it look like the thunder dragon though? I admit its nice but wouldve been cool to have a diff design dont you think? Either way I want one =D
• Meiji wrote on 2011-10-25 20:41

  Quote from Adrianblade;635083:

  Why have it look like the thunder dragon though? I admit its nice but wouldve been cool to have a diff design dont you think? Either way I want one =D

  
  
  Why bother creating a different design when you can just recycle (yes, recycle is the perfect word here) the first one and still make money out of it?
  
  After all, I am buying one if it ever lands here.
• starpaw7 wrote on 2011-10-25 20:41

  Quote from Kenny?;635058:

  Lol the second person looks so content :D

  
  
  I love those poses :XD:
  
  
  But dang it, now I must have the urge to get these too even if they are similar in appearance :shoe:
  
  Although it would be nice if there was a NX upgrade to add to our current Dragons to make turn them into this, instead of buying a whole different pet.
• Karuika wrote on 2011-10-25 20:44
  Oh, I love that passenger pose. I do love torturing passengers... > >
  
  Yeah, it'll probably be ridiculous in price too, but I'd scrape together the money for it anyway. Yay for more two-person flying mounts!~
  
  I love the little harness/seat.
• truefire wrote on 2011-10-25 20:51

  Quote from Karuika;635092:

  Oh, I love that passenger pose. I do love torturing passengers... > >
  
  Yeah, it'll probably be ridiculous in price too, but I'd scrape together the money for it anyway. Yay for more two-person flying mounts!~
  
  I love the little harness/seat.

  
  
  Even without boost, it would officially be the fastest 2-person mount in the game, on land or in the air. While crapping on quite a few 1-person mounts in speed as well.
• Iyasenu wrote on 2011-10-25 21:04
  Oh yes, I want this already.
  
  It could be my first 2 person mount.
  And that second person hanging on for dear life.
  Oh man, that's just too good. xD
• Karuika wrote on 2011-10-25 21:06

  Quote from truefire;635098:

  Even without boost, it would officially be the fastest 2-person mount in the game, on land or in the air. While crapping on quite a few 1-person mounts in speed as well.

  
  
  That'd be even more worth it then. I missed the original dragon when it came out, so I'd get one regardless if I could, but that's really appealing.
  
  It'd make my 200-year-old pelican obsolete for sure..
• M wrote on 2011-10-25 21:06
  Do they get WM and AOE effect still? And is boost confirmed to not be available?