Yeah, kind of odd how things keep lining up.
Why do we keep giving a shit about what people are doing in a third-world country on the other side of the planet? Let the Syrians all kill each other, I say.
There is a rumor on the street that some people aren't psychopaths. Maybe that has something to do with it, but don't take my word for it.
I highly doubt China or Russia would approve of genocide and step in for the Syrian government.
It's not about what Syrian government. Frankly there are plenty cruel dictatorship countries around the globe. The significance of Syrian lies in the petrodollar. Syria along with Libya was planning to introduce new gold currency "Dinar" Which will basically stop US dollar as the sole oil trading currency. Right now petrodollar is the only reason US dollar hasn't crashed. US knows and the world knows that federal reserve has been defrauding everyone by print dollar out of thin air without scaling it to gold production. If Dinar goes public, US dollar will crash (By crash I mean something like 1 million dollar for a marsbar). And US can't let that happen. That's the real reason they are invading Syria, the bomb thing is just an excuse, and if I would venture a guess, it's probably set up by US or other NATO operatives in middle east to give them a legit reason to invade.
Don't believe me? Think on this for a second. US is broke, Government is so broke there is no way to recover from the debt at this point. A nation in this kind of financial situation, shouldn't it be pulling forces back to reduce military cost? Logically yes, but US isn't. So you tell me, is the US government such a group of saints they would rather be broke than let a dictatorship goes unpunished? Maybe some of you truly believe that is the case, but not I.
and if I would venture a guess, it's probably set up by US or other NATO operatives in middle east to give them a legit reason to invade.
Quoted per RealityBreak's quotation:
Funny, because the NATO and the US have been unwilling to do anything in Syria despite public criticism for how long now? They don't need a legit reason to invade to keep the people calm, they need a legit reason to stay out of Syria to keep them calm. If something like what your proposed was the case, I don't think they'd hold out for such a long time, I mean no one is gonna trust these stories anyway, so why should they care so much about making it seem like there's no immediate connection? The unrest created by the alleged favouritism of the NATO is much more noteworthy than what interening in both states would cause. Get fucking real.
You have no clue about the macropolitical situation or the micropolitical situations in Libya or Syria, and neither does the weird ass blogger or whatever you use as a reference. Sitting around before the PC constructing outrageous assumptions out of thin air and a bit of glue doesn't help you understand anything, quite to the contrary.
But fine, if you hate basing your view of the world on sound observations of how the world works and instead choose to deceive yourself for the sake of... getting nervous about the end of the world, do it, if that's what seriously rocks your boat.
Criticising Russia and your beloved China for vetoing anything that could help the Syrian people to lose less of their friends and families in whatever form -after tens of thousands have already perished- would be a better way to spend your energy however.
Oh but wait, humanitarian intervention by the West isn't good, I forgot. Rather they keep their noses out of everyone's business instead of people senselessly dying! That's better for humanity! Right!
Quoted per RealityBreak's quotation:
Funny, because the NATO and the US have been unwilling to do anything in Syria despite public criticism for how long now? They don't need a legit reason to invade to keep the people calm, they need a legit reason to stay out of Syria to keep them calm. If something like what your proposed was the case, I don't think they'd hold out for such a long time, I mean no one is gonna trust these stories anyway, so why should they care so much about making it seem like there's no immediate connection? The unrest created by the alleged favouritism of the NATO is much more noteworthy than what interening in both states would cause. Get fucking real.
You have no clue about the macropolitical situation or the micropolitical situations in Libya or Syria, and neither does the weird ass blogger or whatever you use as a reference. Sitting around before the PC constructing outrageous assumptions out of thin air and a bit of glue doesn't help you understand anything, quite to the contrary.
But fine, if you hate basing your view of the world on sound observations of how the world works and instead choose to deceive yourself for the sake of... getting nervous about the end of the world, do it, if that's what seriously rocks your boat.
Criticising Russia and your beloved China for vetoing anything that could help the Syrian people to lose less of their friends and families in whatever form -after tens of thousands have already perished- would be a better way to spend your energy however.
Oh but wait, humanitarian intervention by the West isn't good, I forgot. Rather they keep their noses out of everyone's business instead of people senselessly dying! That's better for humanity! Right!
I don't believe I've ever said anything about wishing for military intervention in Syria.