Didn't hurt me when I was 12.
My brother broke the computer because of porn, didnt have a computer for 4 years because of it.
Didn't hurt me when I was 12.
My brother broke the computer because of porn, didnt have a computer for 4 years because of it.
Porn doesn't kill computers, people who download viruses thinking its porn do!
I'm pretty sure he broke it because he didn't know how to handle a computer and to not download random exes or something of every malware site out there. That is to say the primary cause was deficient information policy.
How was it determined that exactly porn sites were the cause btw?
That also misses the point of what Cide meant, if I am not mistaken.
This is some next level debate here guys.
Your cheap attempt to rhetorically belittle the argument/me by comparing it/me to gun nut/ arguments falls flat on its face because it is thoroughly flawed.
Perhaps you could elaborate how the malware-infestation of some unsavory so-obscure-it's-underground porn sites affects the web porn market to a noteworthy degree, in particular as its nowadays heavily dominated by sites which do not suffer from this problem. Loaded, working guns, however, are per se fatal.
Coincidentally deactivated or broken guns are purchasable without having to own a weapons possession card even in comparatively restrictive Germany. That is because extrapolating from the specific characteristics of a specific subset (here the ability to fatally harm people with loaded, working guns - or small shitty porn sites with loads of malware) to all units of the corresponding superset (gun constructions - or porn sites) is logically unsound, to put it mildly.
Or let me throw the same cheap rhetorics back at you, but with the twist that it's actually sort of accurate (with a little ad hominem, but more as a vessel to transport my point than real criticism): "PC usage doesn't damage the economy, only neets who refuse to get jobs do!"
And thinking about that gun job phrase for a little more it's actually really funny, because that fact is the very reason that people want to implement what is nominally "gun control". It's really a people control.
1. Because half the discussion that goes on there, gets told to me in some form or another and it is quite bothersome that some members in there are not who they say they are.
2. So i eventually ruled that Rua's House is not really a "mature" discussion area. But an area safe from judging.
Which does not equate to maturity.
3. In the absolute end, i do not think Rua's house should be invite only, make it rep or post count based and remove offenders on a case by case basis.
3. It's not invite only. And a person's rep and post count don't have anything to do with the way they contribute to a discussion.
This is funny because I was actually just agreeing with you. That said, I think what I simplified your statement out to be is very true.
You were wondering if the blame was actually on the guy for being computer illiterate, and not the porn itself. And that is exactly what I was implying myself.
But I think we can all agree that while Nation is many things, it is not a place for porn, yes?
I still can't believe that this is actually still being considered. If people want to see porn when they browse nation, a FANSITE FOR A VIDEO GAME (although many of us don't play anymore), then we might as well have no fucking rules at all and let people run wild and do whatever.