Quote from Nui;1182770:
Going to direct you to my earlier post:
Elves arent underpowered. Just because you cant kill something in one second or because something shines a bit brighter on the battle field doenst warrant a buff. Elves are fine as they are, just because they arent the best doesn't mean that they need a buff. While im not keen on the MWM that was added (mostly because I feel it warrants less work for more output) I dont think it warrants a buff for everything else.
except at this point elves are clearly the worst off
our gunner damage is the lowest
our fighter damage is the lowest
our melee is shit + we lack dual wield
we dont have lances (granted, giants dont have range either but i'll be happy to give them range if it's going to end up as shitty as elf melee)
our range is only slightly better than humans' because of mag, which is rivaled by firebolt anyway b/c it doesn't miss and the only times our mag is decent is with ele reforge and we're hitting stuff that's not ele immune -- generally not endgame content anyway, so cd difference doesn't even matter that much.
our magic damage is essentially the same as humans/giants
hey just look at all those categories that elves suck at
i'm not complaining so much that range is weak, just that we don't excel at range like giants excel at melee. essentially an elf is the worst race to play right now in combat terms
i'm not saying that elves necessarily need a buff, i'd be perfectly happy if giants and humans just got a nerf too =>
and i will take a cs cd reduction over the 1 sec advantage we have on mag cd any day.
i mean why do you think elf range revamp was the most asked for thing on kr polls anyway.
Quote from ironwoman;1182771:
Go to this thread and confirm yourself. It clearly lists many mobs that are not immune to elementals. And regardless, most of the mobs are still not immune to elementals, which is why elemental reforge will still be relevant.
most of the mobs there ARE immune to elementals.. sure you can say that the reforges will still be relevant, but to what extent? they're essentially just getting phased out and becoming completely inconsistent in future content
Quote from ironwoman;1182771:
And I stated that the last archer doesn't need reforge to do 10k normal mags... while the mage does. And it is a fair comparison, because both are maxed reforge as they can be. You really think it's a fair comparison to compare an end game fire wand ego to an unreforged bow?
I didn't say that the bow necessarily has to be unreforged. It's a bad comparison because the bow is elemental reforged and as a result it's inconsistent.
a better comparison would be a lvl 20 max dmg and lvl 20 max bow mastery dmg bow for total of +60 dmg we're going for consistent damage. eles are simply too inconsistent to be a good comparison, because the changes are huge depending on the mob you're facing, whereas the +60 damage would apply everywhere like the reforge on the wand.
anyway, i'm not sure where those stats are coming from? with 1500 cap dex, bhafel, almost maxed ES, and bfo, i can see mag hitting ~12k, but i'd still take 10k firebolt over that anyway
Quote from ironwoman;1182771:
And that 1 sec less cooldown on mag is a huge difference. It's enough difference to show how many shots you can land and how much damage you can do on Fleta, Sephiroth, or Duke in 10 seconds.
fleta wouldn't be hard to kill because if we're talking about an ele bow + endgame player... then how many shots a human can fire within a set time to kill her vs. an elf doing the same reeeaaally doesnt matter at all.
in the case of Sephiroth + Duke, I'd rather be using firebolt since eles would be useless anyway, and firebolt ends up being the same for both races. it's safer and doesn't miss + i dont have to shoot it point blank to be doing decent dps, and it's just so much less connection reliant.