It never was, it's your typical action-adventure game franchise.
Zelda 2 from what I've been told is. Never played it though.
Ya don't have to have stats or level up, there has to be progression of the character, which is simulated elsewhere.
It never was, it's your typical action-adventure game franchise.
Zelda 2 from what I've been told is. Never played it though.
So zelda doesn't count as one now?
Any game where you presume the role of someone or something is a role playing game, which is pretty much every video game ever made. It made more sense when we only had board games; while DnD immersed you heavily into a highly customizable character that you actively portrayed, that was hardly the case in scrabble, pictionary, or most games at the time. Decades later, people assign some weird qualifications to the tag to try to give it some kind of meaning. As a result, we have the following criteria:
IF close to DnD, then RPG else ADVENTURE
The more elitist you are, the closer it has to be to DnD.
Ya don't have to have stats or level up, there has to be progression of the character, which is simulated elsewhere.
Your weapons get higher stats, armor operates on stats
the skill system has different tiers of of the same skill.
You even "role-play" as your character since you give your avatar their own name and they never talk.
How is this not an action rpg
Ya don't have to have stats or level up, there has to be progression of the character, which is simulated elsewhere.
Isn't increasing Hunter Rank and gaining access to new hunts technically leveling up and character progression?
Isn't increasing Hunter Rank and gaining access to new hunts technically leveling up and character progression?
Just going to go by what it's officially classified as
No, again no character stat growth whatsoever. And how is getting access to more content somehow an RPG mechanic? Is Red Dead Redemption an RPG now because you unlock more as you play the game?
Character progression does not make a game an RPG. Battlefield and Call of Duty are not RPGs.
Classified by people who really don't know how the genre works. Japan has never classified the game as RPGs. The fact you thought Zelda was an RPG is a huge warning sign.
The people who think Monster Hunter is an RPG series are probably the same type of people think jRPGs and wRPGs are actual genres.
Actually. Read the article. It mentions Zelda in there for you. If you don't want to. It mentions that the original zelda more or less was "declassified" as an action RPG.
And no. Call of Duty just has an RPG mechanic. (there wasn't any question that it was an RPG, This was discussed when Call of duty 4 came out by their developers stating they added an RPG mechanic)
Maybe in due time MH will be "declassified" as zelda was, but for the time being, it's being called an RPG. Even by capcom.
I mean... does it really matter? Let's not get caught up in classification technicalities and take the game at face value.