Quote from Kenero;330245:
You mean this?:
[Image: http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/7416/mabigolemsize.jpg]
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y196/Dimitri13/golemgraph.jpg
*facepalm*
No matter how many times you repeat this mantra, no reasonable person will buy it. G13 golem > G12 golem. The G13 golem with Clay and EQ is still bigger. If Clay Matery and EQ did not exist, THEN, you could argue that Golems were nerfed. However, they DO exist. Yet your argument seems to say "let's pretend the g13 golem buffs don't exist".
Yes, you could say that Golem was "buffed," but everything else was "buffed." So, in essence, nothing was buffed.
So wait, instead of determining whether a given skill is better in relation to PVE, you're trying to argue that something is nerfed because it didn't get better as fast as other things? The fact that other skills got better buffs is irrelevant. Golem got buffed in G13.
And the fact is, if you were to *really* graph the increase of golem power (never mind that the endpoint of the line on your chart STILL ends above where it was at the end of G12), you would have to use two seperate graphs. Why? Because they are two seperate games. We don't play in KR mabi. We play in NA mabi. Therefore, the concept of buffing comes into play
only in relation to what we had in NA Mabi.
Again, in JP humans get Shadow Bunshin. Other servers do not get this skill. Are we to say that humans got nerfed because they do not have Shadow Bunshin? This is just
one of the many reductio ab absurdums that your definition of "nerf" leads to.