OMG nation drama

• Hanna wrote on 2013-04-01 02:02

  Quote from Hitaki;1059676:

  I mean, if you're just going to type "lol" as a reply in a section not designated in bean rua it only proves you're incapable of constructing a proper argument for what I've said.

  
  
  I was going "lol" to number two
  there isn't much to argue against, I agree with some of what you said.
  
  "us trolls" are you implying that you're a troll? lol, and yet you're like "y u no have logical argument"
• Milk wrote on 2013-04-01 02:05
  :< I guess no one else wants to give there feed back on weather they think that they should add to what qualifies as spamming on this forums?
• Claudia wrote on 2013-04-01 02:06
  All I know is that I want the fucking BR spam to stop.
  
  Last weekend (I think; it was a day on a weekend) I counted 14 threads started by Splat in a span of 24 hours.
  
  In that case I don't care if a user has "trouble processing information," but even someone with severe mental disabilities can understand basic rules like "don't spam." The same goes for any member, not just Splat.
  
  Spam is pretty subjective, but I think it's pretty easy to tell if something has any tangible use after a few posts. If it's a simple question that can be answered by 2-3 people, it's spam. If it's a thread that can start a semi-quality discussion, it deserves to stay.
• Hanna wrote on 2013-04-01 02:07

  Quote from Milk;1059684:

  :< I guess no one else wants to give there feed back on weather they think that they should add to what qualifies as spamming on this forums?

  
  
  I approve
• Hitaki wrote on 2013-04-01 02:07

  Quote from Hanna;1059677:

  I was going "lol" to number two
  there isn't much to argue against

  
  
  So in other words, you feel everyone should know outside of bean rua that one of my points amuses you. You have nothing else worth contributing to the discussion except for quoting my post saying "lol". I wasn't aware that such a post did not constitute as spam, or whether you lacked the aptitude to say anything more about it other than "lol"
• Xemnas wrote on 2013-04-01 02:07
  It looks like things are shaping up already, I guess there's nothing more for me to do.
• Milk wrote on 2013-04-01 02:10

  Quote from Hitaki;1059690:

  So in other words, you feel everyone should know outside of bean rua that one of my points amuses you. You have nothing else worth contributing to the discussion except for quoting my post saying "lol". I wasn't aware that such a post did not constitute as spam, or whether you lacked the aptitude to say anything more about it other than "lol"

  
  
  Hitaki? Seriously what is the point of you calling out hanna over a 3 character post? Trying to continue this drama is pointless. I suggest just taking a few steps back and dropping the small stuff. Especially after you just said that you were tired of all the pointless drama that starts from small stuff.
• Claudia wrote on 2013-04-01 02:11
  I would expect nothing less out of someone who literally only shows up when shit is going down so they can toss their own two cents in.
• Zeo wrote on 2013-04-01 02:11
  I understand most people's perspective on Ash being an new admin with hidden identify from the past.
  
  I would have to agreed with Hitaki for one of his points that if the new admin doesn't reveal who she (or he) is, then well.. yeah... you know? But I'm willing to give it some times and I won't force the new admin to tell who she/he really is.
  
  I can easily tell that she (or he) isn't TA though.
• Hanna wrote on 2013-04-01 02:11

  Quote from Hitaki;1059690:

  I'm a troll yet I'm wondering why I don't get a more appropriate response

  
  
  makes perfect sense.
  Also, I don't get your little vendetta against me, but I will kindly ask for you to get over it.
  --
  On another note, Claudia, I would say most topics can be actual discussions.
  Making a lot =/= spam, especially since without his posts bean rua would be pretty dead
  I think it's more of "I don't like him or seeing his name everywhere"
• Murasaki wrote on 2013-04-01 02:12
  I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND ALL USERS TO PLEASE REFRAIN FROM SHORT, SPAMMY POSTS THAT DON'T ACTUALLY CONTRIBUTE TO THIS TOPIC.
  
  THANKS.
• Ashikoki wrote on 2013-04-01 02:13
  Hitaki, Hanna, Claudia, Milk, the argument over the post "lol" is irrelevant. Break it up.
  
  Meanwhile I'm going to be typing up a storm.
• Claudia wrote on 2013-04-01 02:13

  Quote from Hanna;1059702:

  makes perfect sense.
  
  --
  On another note, Claudia, I would say most topics can be actual discussions.
  Making a lot =/= spam, especially since without his posts bean rua would be pretty dead

  
  
  But making a lot of threads IS spam if most of them are something like, "how do I set up a fish tank?" or "what do I feed my fish?"
  Sure, it's convenient for it to stay in one long discussion thread than multiple, but it's really a one-note kind of thing.
  
  I think we can all agree that the only time 14 threads in one day is acceptable is if they are all of outstanding quality and engaging and interesting to the community. I have no interest in what Splat posts, so Bean Rua is already a wasteland to me.
  
  But see, how is commenting on something another user said spam? It wasn't even just "lol." Seriously?
• Milk wrote on 2013-04-01 02:14

  Quote from Hanna;1059702:

  makes perfect sense.
  
  --
  On another note, Claudia, I would say most topics can be actual discussions.
  Making a lot =/= spam, especially since without his posts bean rua would be pretty dead
  I think it's more of "I don't like him or seeing his name everywhere"

  
  
  I don't know Hanna. It is quite a lot of threads regardless of weather its a good or bad thing.
• Hitaki wrote on 2013-04-01 02:15

  Quote from Milk;1059695:

  Hitaki? Seriously what is the point of you calling out hanna over a 3 character post? Trying to continue this drama is pointless. I suggest just taking a few steps back and dropping the small stuff. Especially after you just said that you were tired of all the pointless drama that starts from small stuff.

  
  
  Well why do you think I called her out over a 3 character post? Obviously to provide a quick example of exactly what I mean, and I can assure you that it doesn't have to be me that lets it happen in the future.
  
  I merely used one of the members who let's it become a problem as an example of someone who lets it get to them.