National Coming Out Day

• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-12 16:42
  all of you are being rude
• Kyishi wrote on 2014-10-12 18:01
  taycat dont worry nothing is going to change with us. please don't treat us any different now than before.
• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-12 20:47

  Quote from Kyishi;1250795:

  taycat dont worry nothing is going to change with us. please don't treat us any different now than before.

  
  
  like i've said, you're all being very rude. you act as if this thread is a joke. it's not. it's a serious discussion. which is why it's not in bean rua.
  or maybe none of you can read.
• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-12 22:29

  Quote from Aubog007;1250752:

  My point was that these people are why it's not as accepted as night and day, and why there exists an urge to "come out".

  
  
  i'm lucky my family members are welcoming of those who are lgbtqa
  i just hope some day we won't need a day such as this and that people can just date whoever and marry whoever without people getting angry
• Zekkii wrote on 2014-10-12 23:37

  Quote from Taycat;1250818:

  i'm lucky my family members are welcoming of those who are lgbtqa
  i just hope some day we won't need a day such as this and that people can just date whoever and marry whoever without people getting angry

  
  So you'd be cool if people could marry infants or adolescents? Perhaps animals? Morality isn't always so black and white. I'm sure LBGT will come through, and I support it, but there's some things I can't sit idly by and accept.
• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-13 00:46

  Quote from Zekkii;1250825:

  So you'd be cool if people could marry infants or adolescents? Perhaps animals? Morality isn't always so black and white. I'm sure LBGT will come through, and I support it, but there's some things I can't sit idly by and accept.

  
  
  did i ever say any of that zekkii? yes, there are some places that allow you to marry infants, adolescents, and animals, but i really don't see how "National Coming Out Day" equates to me wanting people to marry infants, adolescents, and animals...
• Drizzit wrote on 2014-10-13 01:55
  I still don't quite understand the difference between pansexual and bisexual. Like, ok, you reject specific gender notions, but there's still only two sexes, because there's only two sets of biological organs. So you're still attracted to men, women, or both. Of course, what you choose to call yourself is really none of my business; I'm just curious.
• Zeo wrote on 2014-10-13 02:17

  Quote from Drizzit;1250838:

  I still don't quite understand the difference between pansexual and bisexual. Like, ok, you reject specific gender notions, but there's still only two sexes, because there's only two sets of biological organs. So you're still attracted to men, women, or both. Of course, what you choose to call yourself is really none of my business; I'm just curious.

  
  
  To my understanding.
  
  Bisexual means you're attracted to only either male or female (only male and female, they do not get attracted to transsexual and such).
  
  Pansexual is similar, but you're attracted to anyone (usually based on their personality) regardless of genders (male, female, transsexual, and many more)
• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-13 02:23

  Quote from Drizzit;1250838:

  I still don't quite understand the difference between pansexual and bisexual. Like, ok, you reject specific gender notions, but there's still only two sexes, because there's only two sets of biological organs. So you're still attracted to men, women, or both. Of course, what you choose to call yourself is really none of my business; I'm just curious.

  
  
  

  Quote from Zeo;1250841:

  To my understanding.
  
  Bisexual means you're attracted to only either male or female (only male and female, they do not get attracted to transsexual and such).
  
  Pansexual is similar, but you're attracted to anyone (usually based on their personality) regardless of genders (male, female, transsexual, and many more)

  
  
  you're correct zeo.
• SlurpTASTY wrote on 2014-10-13 02:34

  Quote from Zeo;1250841:

  To my understanding.
  
  Bisexual means you're attracted to only either male or female (only male and female, they do not get attracted to transsexual and such).
  
  Pansexual is similar, but you're attracted to anyone (usually based on their personality) regardless of genders (male, female, transsexual, and many more)

  
  
  I still don't get this, unless you're bringing animals into the picture it's still only dick or vagina. So does pansexual just mean you're a furry/brony as well................................
• Yoorah wrote on 2014-10-13 02:48
  ...but what if someone has both?
  :shock2:
• Taycat wrote on 2014-10-13 03:19

  Quote from SlurpTASTY;1250845:

  I still don't get this, unless you're bringing animals into the picture it's still only dick or vagina. So does pansexual just mean you're a furry/brony as well................................

  
  
  no. being a furry or a brony are fandoms. they are not sexual orientations
  
  

  Quote from Yoorah;1250847:

  ...but what if someone has both?
  :shock2:

  
  
  ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
• Aubog007 wrote on 2014-10-13 03:48

  Quote from Yoorah;1250847:

  ...but what if someone has both?
  :shock2:

  
  
  That would fall under the T i believe
  
  
  Also doesn't queer, mean gay?
  
  Least what the dictionary says
  
  Reminds me of that show... Queer eye for the straight guy.
  
  
  Edit: or i can look at the database and find that every single definition was changed. Not cool guys.
  Fuck it, im lumping you into one category. People. You are all people.
• Eos wrote on 2014-10-13 04:11

  Quote from Zeo;1250841:

  
  Pansexual is similar, but you're attracted to anyone (usually based on their personality) regardless of genders (male, female, transsexual, and many more)

  
  
  I've always found the need to claim being pansexual rather obnoxious, and that's coming from someone who fits the definition.
  
  It's like the people who came up with it had to feel that there's something extra special about them that makes them even shinier and sparklier than those who are merely bi. It's an absurdity, really.
  
  I don't feel the need for a unique label to describe me, I settle for gay because that really expresses about all anyone needs to know about me. Funnily enough many of the guys I've fooled around with feel the same way about calling themselves straight.
  
  The bald truth is most everyone is a little everything. If the right person comes into your life at the right time you'll bend regardless how you think of yourself. All these silly labels represent is how comfortable you are with various concepts and how important you feel it is for everyone else to know about it.
  
  Some people have sex with specific genders/orientations/whatever because it feels good. Some people do it because they have deep intimate connections with the other person or people, some people do it because it's what they feel expected to do, some people do it because they don't know they have other options, some people do it for pay. We really don't need a label to define every possible reason a person does has or would have what degree of sex with whom.
  
  The "holiday" is good though, the more people who show that the quaint little notion of 'normal' that America's puritanical little forefathers tried to cram down everyone's throat as a real and valid thing is in fact a myth, and always has been, the better for everyone.
• Compass wrote on 2014-10-13 21:34

  Quote from Eos;1250853:

  The bald truth is most everyone is a little everything. If the right person comes into your life at the right time you'll bend regardless how you think of yourself.
  

  
  Speak for yourself buddy.