This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
Chockeh wrote on 2010-05-01 08:53
Quote from Sin;24354:
I agree with the cat 100%.
Why? Is this called "an imageboard for idiots" or is this called a decent forum? If it's the latter then image responses shouldn't be here. derp
D: I am not the forum mop ;~;
-
Cucurbita wrote on 2010-05-01 19:53
[Image: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v608/KitaeK27/1272635178746.jpg]
You're all a bunch of whiners.
-
Chockeh wrote on 2010-05-01 20:50
Isn't this pretty much the same thing? ._.
Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;21767:
owo
the cat forgot to post this picture
[Image: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c360/ShAdOxViRuS/4chan/NOU.jpg]
sorry if arsik didn't get it
http://mabination.com/mabination/official-nexon-news/1208-nexon-admits-their-forums-bad.html
D:
-
BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-05-02 00:07
Quote from Chocklitshop;24785:
Isn't this pretty much the same thing? ._.
http://mabination.com/mabination/official-nexon-news/1208-nexon-admits-their-forums-bad.html
D:
The cat posted that because arsik didn't get the reference of NO U
and no you was an actual proper response to your post.
-
Emile wrote on 2010-05-02 01:20
Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;24968:
The cat posted that because arsik didn't get the reference of NO U
and no you was an actual proper response to your post.
Squirtle squirtle /squir/ squirtle squirt? Squirtle squirtle, squirt squirtle squirtle. Squirtle squirt, squir squir squirtle-squirt squirtle.
[[So now replying with a /decent/ image is allowed? With all the exceptions and uses of image replies, banning it is a step back in free expression on these forums. With all due respect though, if you can't handle image replies, go to a text-only forum.]]
-
Chiri wrote on 2010-05-02 01:25
If some cases are ok and some aren't... I think the best thing to do is have members self-regulate.
-
BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-05-02 01:40
Quote from Emile;25020:
Squirtle squirtle /squir/ squirtle squirt? Squirtle squirtle, squirt squirtle squirtle. Squirtle squirt, squir squir squirtle-squirt squirtle.
[[So now replying with a /decent/ image is allowed? With all the exceptions and uses of image replies, banning it is a step back in free expression on these forums. With all due respect though, if you can't handle image replies, go to a text-only forum.]]
the cat never said what he posted is okay
it is a good example of why it's not good to have allow image only replies.
-
December wrote on 2010-05-05 12:03
One image responses can be annoying but it really depends on what is it. 'Facepalm' images simply represent the poster's responses to the topic at hand, but its essential to keep them small, no we dont want your friggin startrek face palm taking up 50% of the page. Which brings me to the next point about "if you dont like it, dont look at it", that makes it sound like people stare at the image for 30mins while raging. no, just no. Its not my fault if im browsing a thread and it unavoidably comes on my screen
Personally the "no u" and "tl:dr" crap is way more annoying, if you dont have the brain power to spend time reading a little bit, why even bother posting, your posts arent valued
-
Phunkie wrote on 2010-05-05 13:11
If you're gonna crack down on the image replying, then you're gonna have to do something about the
qq
inb4
lolwut
It's really all the same when you think about it.
-
Chockeh wrote on 2010-05-05 18:58
Quote from Phunkie;28852:
If you're gonna crack down on the image replying, then you're gonna have to do something about the
qq
inb4
lolwut
It's really all the same when you think about it.
I don't even understand what they mean :[, except for the lolwut part :D.
-
Arsik wrote on 2010-05-05 19:25
qq = QQ which is another way of saying that you're about to cry (the tails on the Q's look like tears are forming at the outside of the eyes)
inb4 = In before... Generally what people say in a thread that's almost guaranteed to be lock. Another way of getting +1 to their post count.
-
Chiri wrote on 2010-05-05 19:51
Yeah, I'm not a fan of the "if you can't deal with it, just deal with it" attitude that some members have.
In addition, the "what is this, I don't even..." is getting kind of old and doesn't add anything to the conversation.
-
bebepanales wrote on 2010-05-10 08:44
i didnt read the posts on page 4 and 5 i was too lazy.
i dont see anything wrong with one picture posts that convey an emotion in reaction to something said previously. it's still like an ongoing conversation, i think zephyri said that too... i think. i dont remember. most of them aren't really meant for trolling imo~
like the example you provided, i think he was just trying to be funny and didn't mean to start beef, because those pictures were meant to be funny.
however i guess the ideal thing would be for them to elaborate and contribute a little to the topic after posting the picture emote. if there were a string of those 1picture posts in one thread, then that would be getting out of hand i admit. i think 1 or 2 wouldn't hurt a thread~ i think itll rather make it more fun and interesting x3
ps. i confess i do write "lol @ (whomever)" posts.... sometimes some things are so funny you just have to express yourself x3 sorry if that's wrong.
-
Virtue wrote on 2010-05-10 17:54
Quote from Phunkie;28852:
If you're gonna crack down on the image replying, then you're gonna have to do something about the
qq
inb4
lolwut
It's really all the same when you think about it.
Not really. "qq" doesn't take up half my browser page like a useless image does.
-
Chillax wrote on 2010-05-10 18:29
I haven't seen any image replies outside of General Discussion and Spam Zone, and I haven't seen anyone trolling another person with images; how different would it be if Chocklitshop said "hell no" without the image? Personally, I feel that related images make General Discussion more animated and funny, which we're usually looking for in the Entertainment and Everything Else sections. If we have image replying in Questions and Help and Mabinogi Talk, then we might have a problem.