Please Ban Image Replying

• Kazuni wrote on 2010-05-12 03:21

  Quote from Moppy;34016:

  http://mexe.us/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/justin-bieber-dead.jpg
  
  That's why.
  
  But seriously, I like image replies. When they are on topic, they are entertaining and put a smile on my face.

  
  
  But like already said, who does that? If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.
• Kyouria wrote on 2010-05-12 03:33
  I block many image source links using Adblock 'cause some of the images take up the entire page or serve as eye-sores. I don't like image replies; I usually skip over them but as long as its "relevant" to the thread and "contributes" somehow, I guess it's not a bannable offense. >.>
• Kazuni wrote on 2010-05-12 03:36

  Quote from Yumi;34045:

  I block many image source links using Adblock 'cause some of the images take up the entire page or serve as eye-sores. I don't like image replies; I usually skip over them but as long as its "relevant" to the thread and "contributes" somehow, I guess it's not a bannable offense. >.>

  
  
  We could have a poll. Evidently some people don't like it, but some people do.
  
  Although imo, banning images would = banning emoticons, faces such as o.o, o-o, Q(>o<Q), or any of that stuff, because technically they belong in the same category. As for the taking up the whole page, the forum resizes it, does it not? Unless you're talking about image mobs, which only really happens when people are posting images of different things for that specific purpose. If that made any sense. To just contribute to a conversation, it'd be usually one or maybe two images, and they wouldn't take up "the whole page".
• Kyouria wrote on 2010-05-12 03:43

  Quote from Kazuni;34049:

  We could have a poll. Evidently some people don't like it, but some people do.
  
  Although imo, banning images would = banning emoticons, faces such as o.o, o-o, Q(>o<Q), or any of that stuff, because technically they belong in the same category. As for the taking up the whole page, the forum resizes it, does it not? Unless you're talking about image mobs, which only really happens when people are posting images of different things for that specific purpose. If that made any sense. To just contribute to a conversation, it'd be usually one or maybe two images, and they wouldn't take up "the whole page".

  
  
  Forum posts with emoticons usually have other content. I would have to admit, some image replies (with captions) are entertaining. If it's not excessive image replies or pages filled with image-only replies, I don't think it's a problem.
• Kazuni wrote on 2010-05-12 03:50

  Quote from Yumi;34055:

  Forum posts with emoticons usually have other content. I would have to admit, some image replies (with captions) are entertaining. If it's not excessive image replies or pages filled with image-only replies, I don't think it's a problem.

  
  
  I don't think that was common in the first place.
• Hiccup wrote on 2010-05-12 05:30

  Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;33806:

  You abducted Madoge Nanami by having her in your avatar box :/

  
  
  

  [Image: http://fukung.net/images/5272/Vicodin.jpg]

  
  
  Oh wait wut?
  
  Did I see moppy posting JB!? Sup shawty
• BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-05-12 05:33
  What's with all the image replies in this thread anyway?
• Hiccup wrote on 2010-05-12 05:34
  Irony.
• Cucurbita wrote on 2010-05-12 05:38

  Quote from bradstrt;34159:

  Irony.

  
  
  Take my waifu off your avatar, scum!
• BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-05-12 05:40

  Quote from bradstrt;34159:

  Irony.

  
  
  Naw, you are all dumb because you all know this annoys the cat.
  *captain obvious*
  and rubbing it in that you can.
• Cucurbita wrote on 2010-05-12 05:47

  Quote from kitaek27;34010:

  
  Usually when replying with a picture there is going to be relevance, whether it be an expression, a facepalm, or captions.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  

  Quote from Kazuni;34033:

  If it's off-topic, and the posts only consists of an image, it's spam. That's already against the rules.

  
  
  /thread.
• Virtue wrote on 2010-05-12 10:58

  Quote from Xiyamae;33296:

  Thing is, your saying these images are stupid is like saying your way of acting like a cat is stupid.

  
  Uhm, no. That's a bad analogy and you should feel bad.
• Taycat wrote on 2010-05-13 13:28
  By the way cat, why not just skim over the image?
  
  What's so wrong with that?
• BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2010-05-14 05:16
  because that's TL;DR
  which is different.
  The cat actually read posts so that the cat won't give stupid /b/tarded replies like Poopshop or whatever his name was.
  
  http://mabination.com/mabination/mabination-discussion/1474-please-ban-image-replying-7.html#post33496
• Chockeh wrote on 2010-05-14 05:36

  Quote from BobYoMeowMeow;35594:

  because that's TL;DR
  which is different.
  The cat actually read posts so that the cat won't give stupid /b/tarded replies like Poopshop or whatever his name was.
  
  http://mabination.com/mabination/mabination-discussion/1474-please-ban-image-replying-7.html#post33496

  
  
  

  [Image: http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/lolcats-funny-picture-baby-i-love-you.jpg]