This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
Coy wrote on 2011-03-06 19:00
Quote from Kazuni;362273:
That's what was said a LONG time ago in their thread, but Coy and Cide didn't go for it >_>
no you're all just goddamn blind because i did, and i even reiterated that i did. =____e
-
Kazuni wrote on 2011-03-06 19:01
Quote from Coy;362281:
no you're all just goddamn blind because i did, and i even reiterated that i did. =____e
And yet you continue to pursue the issue.
Quote from Cide;362279:
that is allowed, but why should you have to censor a nonsexual image when you don't have to censor your speech of blatantly sexual things at the same time? text is not words, but i have a feeling you guys still living with your parents (most of the moderation) just don't want your parents seeing weiners.
again, if it were titties or a female crotch area, NONE of you would have said a damn WORD.
Uh, if I missed the point where female anatomy stopped being nudity, then please enlighten me.
And no, we don't want our parent seeing weiners. Is that not okay?
-
Coy wrote on 2011-03-06 19:02
Quote from Kazuni;362283:
And yet you continue to pursue the issue.
actually, i think about seven other people are doing it for me.
-
Shirayuki wrote on 2011-03-06 19:03
Quote from Coy;362285:
actually, i think about seven other people are doing it for me.
Seven people are that stupid?
/runs
-
Kazuni wrote on 2011-03-06 19:04
Quote from Coy;362285:
actually, i think about seven other people are doing it for me.
At any rate, we offered up the compromise and people are still complaining.
So. What's the damn problem?
We've cleared up text =/= image, text limits =/= image limits.
We're allowing mature discussion but we sure as hell are not allowing nudity posted directly on the forum. A link is fine. Censors are mostly fine.
-
Cide wrote on 2011-03-06 19:04
Quote from Shirayuki;362289:
Seven people are that stupid?
/runs
seven people can spot the double-standard going on :D
-
Kueh wrote on 2011-03-06 19:04
Quote from Cide;362279:
tl;dr; censoring itself was not the issue. censoring coupled with the conversation allowed is.
So what do you suggest?
Also, I'd like to say that several mature discussions have been locked because they became too explicit.
-
Shirayuki wrote on 2011-03-06 19:04
Quote from Cide;362291:
seven people can spot the double-standard going on :D
Seven people want to see penisu :D
-
Taycat wrote on 2011-03-06 19:04
Quote from Shirayuki;362289:
Seven people are that stupid?
/runs
Or seven people that are mature enough to know what a penis is?
-
Cide wrote on 2011-03-06 19:05
Quote from Lyre;362293:
So what do you suggest?
ban both or allow both.
-
Piko wrote on 2011-03-06 19:05
Quote from Kazuni;362290:
We're allowing mature discussion but we sure as hell are not allowing nudity posted directly on the forum. A link is fine. Censors are mostly fine.
Wat. Links are fine now? I guess I can post links to Sankaku now.
-
Kazuni wrote on 2011-03-06 19:05
Quote from Cide;362297:
ban both or allow both.
So you're saying that member should be just as allowed to post porn as say the word porn?
Quote from Pikablu;362300:
Wat. Links are fine now? I guess I can post links to Sankaku now.
Don't push your luck, marill.
-
Coy wrote on 2011-03-06 19:05
anyway, if text is not the same as pictures, then why do people get charged and/or arrested for verbal and written threats even if there was no seriousness behind it?
what's to stop 18+ people from asking children really perverted questions? people don't know one another's age on here for sure and there's no stopping some older person from getting their jollies knowing what an underage kid does with their hand, or how many other things they do to their nether bits. it's all the same to me, if you're going to shut out nonsexual nudity, then it should be to the same power as sexual conversation.
i'm already done with my issue and i plan to take care of it refraining from posting here anymore, but i'm just trying to figure out why any of you think they're so VASTLY different.
-
Taycat wrote on 2011-03-06 19:05
Quote from Cide;362297:
ban both or allow both.
I agree with this.
-
Shirayuki wrote on 2011-03-06 19:06
Quote from kNocturn;362295:
Or seven people that are mature enough to know what a penis is?
Or seven people don't understand that sometimes, a topic is too mature for some age demographics to see.
I say ban both, like Cide kinda said.