Or seven people don't understand that sometimes, a topic is too mature for some age demographics to see.
I say ban both, like Cide kinda said.
Or seven people who-
I got nothing.
Or seven people don't understand that sometimes, a topic is too mature for some age demographics to see.
I say ban both, like Cide kinda said.
I agree with this.
^
No matter what you guys may claim, it's a double standard. Words can do just as much as images.
Stop making excuses, srsly. I'll respect your wishes, but not when your wishes are retarded, hypocrite and biased wishes.
Seriously. Either allow them both, or don't. They go hand in hand.
Talking about it is no different from posting a picture about it.
Seriously?
After we finally give way to your requests for more mature discussions (ahem, TEXT) to be allowed, you want it to be revoked?
You guys were the ones who asked for mature discussions. They do not go hand in hand. I can read a discussion and not feel like I'm staring at a photo of a penis.
And what in the world made you think text porn = mature discussion?
yes. if you're going to disallow NONsexual nudity, you should at least disallow SEXUAL conversation.
NUDITY is not PORN. thus your WORD porn != IMAGE porn argument is completely invalid. we're not ASKING to be able to post PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGERY.
Parents are less likely to spot the word penis than an image of one. There is a thin line between what is appropriate and inappropriate if we allow nudity on the forum.
I'm kind of agreeing with the "ban both or don't," because I have seen some things go in kind of an iffy direction. That being said though, I'd rather the "ban both" road be taken, because I for one don't want to be seeing a penis or a vagina or anything related on my screen, thanks.
So what you're telling us to do is to completely disallow mature conversation?
Which you asked and complained about in the first place?
So what you're telling us to do is to completely disallow mature conversation?
Which you asked and complained about in the first place?