Quote from chaolin;583827:
Why listen to it if it's:
1) Not constructive to the topic
2) Straight up rude
Flaw with this argument is that if its unanimously agreeable that a person's post is both rude and noncontributive, it shouldn't exist at all, and therefore your goal should be to report it rather than to place it in ignore so that more and more of these posts can swamp the nation.
It was my understanding that its because we can see it that we can stop it in its tracks.
If "annoying members" are to be placed in ignore rather than taken care of properly as a community, then its really the same as letting them run rampant around the place. Thats like if Osayidan said "I'm going to put a video ad on every post of the forum, but don't worry because you can block them in the options if you really want".
And your argument stems from the thought that the ignore function will actually not be abused. But whether you know it or not, you will end up using it where its not completely necessary, whether it be due to a misunderstanding or maybe even a mistake. I would think such a scenario happens more frequently than most people really believe.
As comedic proof of this, I refer to you, every last episode of Anpanman. The poor thing is just trying to do what it can to help others, but he's always made out to be the "bad guy" because characters jump to conclusions.
[Image: http://wanderingvegans.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/anpanman.jpg]