This is an archive of the mabination.com forums which were active from 2010 to 2018. You can not register, post or otherwise interact with the site other than browsing the content for historical purposes. The content is provided as-is, from the moment of the last backup taken of the database in 2019. Image and video embeds are disabled on purpose and represented textually since most of those links are dead.
To view other archive projects go to
https://archives.mabination.com
-
BobYoMeowMeow wrote on 2012-02-20 02:53
SENATE FLOOR VERSION
February 8, 2012
SENATE BILL NO. 1433 By: Crain of the Senate
and
Billy of the House
An Act relating to unborn children; creating the Personhood Act; providing short title; stating legislative findings; specifying the interpretation of certain laws; defining certain terms; prohibiting certain interpretation; providing for codification; and providing an effective date.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1-750 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
A. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Personhood Act".
B. The Oklahoma Legislature finds that:
1. The life of each human being begins at conception;
2. Unborn children have protectable interests in life, health, and well-being; and
3. The natural parents of unborn children have protectable interests in the life, health, and well-being of their unborn child.
C. The laws of this state shall be interpreted and construed to acknowledge on behalf of the unborn child at every stage of development all the rights, privileges, and immunities available to other persons, citizens, and residents of this state.
D. As used in this section, “unborn child†or “unborn children†shall include all unborn children or the offspring of human beings from the moment of conception until birth at every stage of biological development.
E. Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as creating a cause of action against a woman for indirectly harming her unborn child by failing to properly care for herself or by failing to follow any particular program of prenatal care.
SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2012.
COMMITTEE REPORT BY: COMMITTEE ON HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, dated 2 6 12 - DO PASS.
http://newlsb.lsb.state.ok.us/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=SB1433
The bill would define life as beginning at conception, effectively banning all abortions and many forms of contraception. The bill would also ban women from getting an abortion if they are raped because there are no exceptions in it.
This bill is worded so poorly that it can define natural miscarriage as involuntary manslaughter since life begins at conception.
-
Claudia wrote on 2012-02-20 02:55
Awesome.
Just...awesome.
Despicable. People being robbed of their freedoms, huzzah.
-
Cheerios wrote on 2012-02-20 03:14
if i was american i would be questioning where my tax money is being used on.......
-
Claudia wrote on 2012-02-20 03:18
Quote from Cheerios;779542:
if i was american i would be questioning where my tax money is being used on.......
Most of us do daily, dw.
I thought Mississippi was trying to pass the same thing, not sure how that worked out.
-
EndlessDreams wrote on 2012-02-20 03:31
So if a woman takes one of those Plan B pills right after conception, how much people did that woman just killed?
The embyro could have been any of the following possibilities:
Zero due to natural miscarriages later
One if everything goes "normal"
Two or more if it splits to become identical twins/triplets/etc.
-
Kollin wrote on 2012-02-20 03:53
How stupid. I bet they would be singing a different tune if their wife/daughters were raped and impregnated by the rapist.
-
Osayidan wrote on 2012-02-20 04:00
Did the pope bring them a large sack with a $ sign on it or what...
-
Chiyuri wrote on 2012-02-20 04:03
Watch as that state suddenly lose a lot of residant over time until November..
-
Yoorah wrote on 2012-02-20 04:21
The pro-life side has good intentions and several good points, but this thing is clearly flawed.
I guess it means people will have to go to another state to perform abortions. Maybe more couples will use condoms and stuff now.
-
ZazieTheBeast wrote on 2012-02-20 04:24
let them keep the law. maybe all the pro life people will move there and then we can fence them in
-
Chiyuri wrote on 2012-02-20 04:35
Quote from ZazieTheBeast;779625:
let them keep the law. maybe all the pro life people will move there and then we can fence them in
Fence them in -.-
It sound means but it made me laught.
-
Kollin wrote on 2012-02-20 04:37
Quote from Chiyuri;779634:
Fence them in -.-
It sound means but it made me laught.
Fence them in then nuke the area.
-
Armi wrote on 2012-02-20 04:59
Bill redacted from : Ensuring the welfare of future taxpayers (suckers) applicable and continued population of 'murica's lawful labor camps.
-
paladin wrote on 2012-02-20 05:22
Am surpised this even passed
But wow
I wont be surpised if the see a decline in population
Admittidly ,Americans dont like other people poking into their personal matters
-
Chiyuri wrote on 2012-02-20 05:23
Quote from Kollin;779635:
Fence them in then nuke the area.
I feel bad for the wild animals there so don't ^^;